flxn-def14a_20200610.htm

 

 

 

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

 

Filed by the Registrant    

 

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant    

 

 

Check the appropriate box:

Preliminary Proxy Statement

Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

Definitive Proxy Statement

Definitive Additional Materials

Soliciting Material Pursuant to § 240.14a-12

Flexion Therapeutics, Inc.

 

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

 

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement if Other Than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

No fee required.

Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

 

1.

Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

 

 

2.

Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

 

 

3.

Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (Set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

 

 

4.

Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

 

 

5.

Total fee paid:

 

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

 

1.

Amount Previously Paid:

 

 

2.

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

 

 

3.

Filing Party:

 

 

4.

Date Filed:

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

FLEXION THERAPEUTICS, INC.

 

NOTICE OF 2020 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

To Be Held On June 10, 2020

Dear Stockholder:

You are cordially invited to attend the 2020 annual meeting of stockholders of FLEXION THERAPEUTICS, INC. , a Delaware corporation (the “Company”). We have adopted a completely virtual format for our annual meeting to provide a consistent and convenient experience to all stockholders regardless of location. You will be able to participate in the annual meeting online, vote your shares electronically and submit your questions before and during the annual meeting by visiting www.proxydocs.com/FLXN. In order to attend and/or participate, you must register in advance at www.proxydocs.com/FLXN prior to the deadline of June 8, 2020 at 5:00 Eastern Time. Upon properly completing your registration, you will receive further instructions via email, including your unique live meeting link that will allow you access to the annual meeting and will also permit you to vote electronically and submit questions at the meeting. You will not be able to attend the annual meeting in person.

The annual meeting will be held on Wednesday, June 10, 2020 at 12:00 p.m. Eastern Time. The annual meeting will be a virtual stockholders’ meeting being held for the following purposes:

 

1.

To elect three (3) Class III directors named in the proxy statement to serve on the Company’s Board of Directors until the 2023 annual meeting of stockholders;

 

 

2.

To ratify the selection, by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors, of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for its fiscal year ending December 31, 2020;

 

3 .

To approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers, as disclosed in the proxy statement; and

 

4 .

To conduct any other business properly brought before the meeting.

The Company’s Board of Directors urges you to read the accompanying proxy statement carefully and recommends the approval of each of the proposals, which are more fully described in the proxy statement.

The record date for the annual meeting is April 13, 2020. Only stockholders of record at the close of business on that date may vote at the annual meeting or any adjournment thereof.

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the 2020 annual meeting of Stockholders to be
Held on June 10, 2020. Information for attending the annual meeting is available at www.proxydocs.com/FLXN.

The proxy statement and annual report to stockholders are available free of charge at: www.proxydocs.com/FLXN.

 

By Order of the Board of Directors

 

 

Mark S. Levine

Corporate Secretary

 

Burlington, MA

April 29, 2020

 

You are cordially invited to attend the virtual meeting. Your vote is important. Regardless of whether you plan to attend the virtual meeting, please vote by proxy over the telephone or through the internet as instructed in these materials, or using a proxy card that you may request or that we may elect to deliver at a later time, as promptly as possible, to ensure your representation at the meeting. Even if you have voted by proxy, you may still vote online if you attend the virtual meeting. Please note, however, that if your shares are held of record by a broker, bank or other nominee and you wish to vote at the meeting, you must obtain a proxy issued in your name from that record holder in order to vote your shares that are held in such agent’s name and account.

 

 

 

 


 

Table of Contents— 20 20 Proxy Statement

 

 

Page

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THESE PROXY MATERIALS AND VOTING

1

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

6

PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

7

INFORMATION REGARDING THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

10

PROPOSAL 2: RATIFICATION OF SELECTION OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

18

PROPOSAL 3: COMPENSATION OF THE COMPANY’S NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

19

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

22

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

24

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

45

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

46

TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PERSONS

48

HOUSEHOLDING OF PROXY MATERIALS

49

OTHER MATTERS

50

 

 

 

 


 

FLEXION THERAPEUTICS, INC.

 

PROXY STATEMENT

FOR THE 2020 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

To be held on June 10, 2020

 

Questions and Answers About These Proxy Materials and Voting

Why did I receive a notice regarding the availability of proxy materials on the internet?

Pursuant to rules adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), we have elected to provide access to our proxy materials over the internet. Accordingly, we have sent you a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”) because the Board of Directors (the “Board of Directors,” “Board” or “our Board”) of Flexion Therapeutics, Inc. (the “Company,” “we,” “our,” “us” or “Flexion”) is soliciting your proxy to vote at the 2020 annual meeting of stockholders, including at any adjournments or postponements of the meeting.

All stockholders will have the ability to access the proxy materials on the website referred to in the Notice or request to receive a printed set of the proxy materials. Instructions on how to access the proxy materials over the internet or to request a printed copy may be found in the Notice. Please note that, while our proxy materials are available at the website referenced in the Notice, and our Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders, this Proxy Statement and 2019 Annual Report on Form 10-K are available on our website, no other information contained on either website is incorporated by reference in or considered to be a part of this document. Further, information contained on, or that can be accessed through, our website is not intended to be incorporated by reference into this proxy statement and references to our website address in this proxy statement are inactive textual references only.

We intend to mail the Notice on or about May 1, 2020 to all stockholders of record entitled to vote at the annual meeting.

Will I receive any other proxy materials by mail?

We may send you a proxy card, along with a second notice, on or after May 12, 2020.

How do I attend the annual meeting?

We will be hosting the annual meeting only by means of a live webcast. There will not be a physical meeting location and you will not be able to attend the meeting in person. To participate in the annual meeting virtually via the internet, please visit www.proxydoc.com/FLXN prior to the meeting.

You must register by June 8, 2020 at 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time to attend the annual meeting webcast.

Upon properly completing your registration, you will receive further instructions via email, including your unique live meeting link that will allow you access to the annual meeting and will permit you to submit questions before and during the annual meeting and vote.

Who can vote at the annual meeting?

Only stockholders of record at the close of business on April 13, 2020 will be entitled to vote at the annual meeting. On this record date, there were 38,562,504 shares of common stock outstanding and entitled to vote.

A list of stockholders entitled to vote at the annual meeting will be available for examination at our principal executive offices at the address listed above for a period of 10 days prior to the annual meeting, and during the annual meeting such list will be available for examination at www.proxydoc.com/FLXN .

 

1


 

Stockholder of Record: Shares Registered in Your Name

If on April 13, 2020, your shares were registered directly in your name with Flexion’s transfer agent, Computershare Trust Company, N.A., then you are a stockholder of record. As a stockholder of record, you may vote electronically at the meeting or vote by proxy. Whether or not you plan to participate in the virtual meeting, we urge you to vote over the internet or by telephone, or by requesting and returning a proxy card, to ensure your vote is counted.

Beneficial Owner: Shares Registered in the Name of a Broker or Bank

If on April 13, 2020, your shares were held not in your name, but rather in an account at a brokerage firm, bank, dealer or other similar organization, then you are the beneficial owner of shares held in “street name” and the Notice is being forwarded to you by that organization. The organization holding your account is considered to be the stockholder of record for purposes of voting at the annual meeting. As a beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your broker or other agent regarding how to vote the shares in your account. You are also invited to attend the virtual annual meeting. However, since you are not the stockholder of record, you may not vote your shares electronically at the virtual meeting unless you request and obtain a valid proxy from your broker or other agent.

What am I voting on?

There are three matters scheduled for a vote:

 

Election of three Class III directors named herein to serve on our Board until our 2023 annual meeting of stockholders (Proposal 1);

 

Ratification of the selection, by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors, of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for our fiscal year ending December 31, 2020 (Proposal 2); and

 

An advisory vote on the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers (Proposal 3).

What if another matter is properly brought before the meeting?

The Board of Directors knows of no other matters that will be presented for consideration at the annual meeting. If any other matters are properly brought before the meeting, it is the intention of the persons named herein to vote on those matters in accordance with their best judgment.

How do I vote?

For the election of directors, you may either vote “For” all the nominees to the Board of Directors or you may “Withhold” your vote for any nominee you specify. For the ratification of the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for our fiscal year ending December 31, 2020, you may vote “For” or “Against” or abstain from voting. For the advisory vote on the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers, you may vote “For” or “Against” or abstain from voting.

The procedures for voting are fairly simple:

Stockholder of Record: Shares Registered in Your Name

If you are a stockholder of record, you may vote electronically at the virtual annual meeting, vote by proxy over the telephone, vote by proxy through the internet or vote by proxy using a proxy card that you may request or that we may elect to deliver at a later time. Whether or not you plan to participate in the virtual meeting, we urge you to vote by proxy to ensure your vote is counted. You may still attend the virtual meeting and vote electronically at the meeting even if you have already voted by proxy.

 

To vote at the virtual annual meeting, you must register in advance at www.proxydocs.com/FLXN prior to the deadline of June 8, 2020 at 5:00 pm Eastern Time. You will be asked to provide the company number and control number from the Notice. Upon properly completing your registration, you will receive further instructions via email, including your unique live meeting link that will allow you access to the meeting and you will have the ability to vote electronically.

 

To vote using the printed proxy card that may be mailed to you, simply complete, sign and date the proxy card and return it promptly in the envelope provided. If you return your signed proxy card to us before the annual meeting, we will vote your shares as you direct.

2


 

 

To vote over the telephone, dial toll-free 1-8 66 - 291-6836 using a touch-tone phone and follow the recorded instructions. You will be asked to provide the company number and control number from the Notice. Your telephone vote must be received by 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time on June  9 , 2020 to be counted.

 

To vote through the internet, go to www.proxydocs.com/FLXN to complete an electronic proxy card. You will be asked to provide the company number and control number from the Notice.

Beneficial Owner: Shares Registered in the Name of Broker or Bank

If you are a beneficial owner of shares registered in the name of your broker, bank or other agent, you should have received a Notice containing voting instructions from that organization rather than from Flexion. Simply follow the voting instructions in the Notice to ensure that your vote is counted. To vote electronically at the annual meeting, you must obtain a valid proxy from your broker, bank or other agent. Follow the instructions from your broker, bank or other agent included with these proxy materials, or contact your broker, bank or other agent to request a proxy form.

 

Internet proxy voting is being provided to allow you to vote your shares online, with procedures designed to ensure the authenticity and correctness of your proxy vote instructions. However, please be aware that you must bear any costs associated with your internet access, such as usage charges from internet access providers and telephone companies.

 

How many votes do I have?

On each matter to be voted upon, you have one vote for each share of common stock you own as of April 13, 2020.

What happens if I do not vote?

Stockholder of Record: Shares Registered in Your Name

If you are a stockholder of record and do not vote by completing your proxy card, by telephone, through the internet or electronically during the annual meeting, your shares will not be voted.

Beneficial Owner: Shares Registered in the Name of Broker or Bank

If you are a beneficial owner and do not instruct your broker, bank or other agent how to vote your shares, the question of whether your broker or nominee will still be able to vote your shares depends on whether the particular proposal is considered to be a routine matter under applicable rules. Brokers and nominees can use their discretion to vote “uninstructed” shares with respect to matters that are considered to be “routine” under applicable rules but not with respect to “non-routine” matters. Under applicable rules and interpretations, “non-routine” matters are matters that may substantially affect the rights or privileges of stockholders, such as mergers, stockholder proposals, elections of directors (even if not contested), executive compensation (including any advisory stockholder votes on executive compensation and on the frequency of stockholder votes on executive compensation) and certain corporate governance proposals, even if management-supported. Accordingly, your broker or nominee may not vote your shares on Proposals 1 or 3 without your instructions but may vote your shares on Proposal 2 even in the absence of your instruction.

What if I return a proxy card or otherwise vote but do not make specific choices?

If you return a signed and dated proxy card or otherwise vote without marking voting selections, your shares will be voted, as applicable, “For” the election of all three nominees for director named in this proxy statement; “For” the ratification of the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for our fiscal year ending December 31, 2020; and “For” the approval of the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers. If any other matter is properly presented at the meeting, your proxyholder (one of the individuals named on your proxy card) will vote your shares using his or her best judgment.

Who is paying for this proxy solicitation?

We will pay for the entire cost of soliciting proxies. In addition to these proxy materials, our directors and employees may also solicit proxies in person, by telephone or by other means of communication. Directors and employees will not be paid any additional compensation for soliciting proxies. We may also reimburse brokerage firms, banks and other agents for the cost of forwarding proxy materials to beneficial owners.

3


 

What does it mean if I receive more than one Notice?

If you receive more than one Notice, your shares may be registered in more than one name or in different accounts. Please follow the voting instructions on the Notices to ensure that all of your shares are voted.

Can I change my vote after submitting my proxy?

Stockholder of Record: Shares Registered in Your Name

Yes. You can revoke your proxy at any time before the final vote at the meeting. If you are the record holder of your shares, you may revoke your proxy in any one of the following ways:

 

You may submit another properly completed proxy card with a later date (which automatically revokes your earlier proxy).

 

You may grant a subsequent proxy by telephone or through the internet.

 

You may send a timely written notice that you are revoking your proxy to Flexion’s Corporate Secretary at 10 Mall Road, Suite 301, Burlington, MA 01803.

 

You may attend the virtual annual meeting and submit your vote electronically at that time. Simply attending the meeting will not, by itself, revoke your proxy.

Your most current proxy card or telephone or internet proxy is the one that is counted.

Beneficial Owner: Shares Registered in the Name of Broker or Bank

If your shares are held by your broker or bank as a nominee or agent, you should follow the instructions provided by your broker or bank.

When are stockholder proposals and director nominations due for next year’s annual meeting?

To be considered for inclusion in next year’s proxy materials, your proposal (including a director nomination) must be submitted in writing by January 1, 2021, to the attention of the Corporate Secretary of Flexion Therapeutics, Inc. at 10 Mall Road, Suite 301, Burlington, MA 01803. If you wish to submit a proposal (including a director nomination) at the 2021 annual meeting of stockholders that is not to be included in next year’s proxy materials, you must do so between February 10, 2021 and March 12, 2021. You are also advised to review Flexion’s amended and restated bylaws (the “Bylaws”), which contain additional requirements about advance notice of stockholder proposals and director nominations.

How are votes counted?

Votes will be counted by the inspector of election appointed for the meeting, who will separately count, (i) for Proposal 1 to elect directors, votes “For,” “Withhold” and broker non-votes, (ii) for Proposal 2 to ratify the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, votes “For” and “Against,” abstentions and broker non-votes, and (iii) for Proposal 3, the advisory vote on the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers, votes “For” and “Against” and abstentions. Broker non-votes on Proposals 1 and 3 will have no effect and will not be counted towards the vote total for any of these proposals.

What are “broker non-votes”?

As discussed above, when a beneficial owner of shares held in “street name” does not give instructions to the broker or nominee holding the shares as to how to vote on matters deemed to be “non-routine,” the broker or nominee cannot vote the shares. These unvoted shares are counted as “broker non-votes.”  Proposals 1 and 3 are considered to be “non-routine” under applicable rules and we therefore expect broker non-votes to exist in connection with those proposals.

4


 

How many votes are needed to approve each proposal?

The following table summarizes the minimum vote needed to approve each proposal and the effect of abstentions and broker non-votes.

 

Proposal Number

 

Proposal Description

 

Vote Required for Approval

 

Effect of Abstentions

 

Effect of Broker Non-Votes

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

  

Election of directors

 

The three nominees receiving the most “For” votes

 

 

Not Applicable

 

None

2

 

Ratification of the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2020

 

 

“For” votes from the holders of a majority of shares present at the virtual meeting or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on the matter

 

Against

 

Not Applicable

3

  

Advisory approval of the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers

 

 

 

“For” votes from the holders of a majority of shares present at the virtual meeting or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on the matter

 

 

Against

 

None

What is the quorum requirement?

A quorum of stockholders is necessary to hold a valid meeting. A quorum will be present if stockholders holding at least a majority of the outstanding shares entitled to vote are present at the virtual meeting or represented by proxy. On April 13, 2020, the record date, there were 38,562,504 shares outstanding and entitled to vote. Thus, the holders of at least 19,281,253 shares must be present at the virtual meeting or represented by proxy at the virtual meeting to have a quorum.

Your shares will be counted towards the quorum only if you submit a valid proxy (or one is submitted on your behalf by your broker, bank or other nominee) or if you vote electronically at the virtual meeting. Abstentions and broker non-votes will be counted towards the quorum requirement. If there is no quorum, the chairman of the meeting or the holders of a majority of shares present at the virtual meeting or represented by proxy may adjourn the meeting to another date.

How can I find out the results of the voting at the annual meeting?

Preliminary voting results will be announced at the annual meeting. In addition, final voting results will be published in a current report on Form 8-K that we expect to file within four business days after the annual meeting. If final voting results are not available to us in time to file a Form 8-K within four business days after the annual meeting, we intend to file a Form 8-K to publish preliminary results and, within four business days after the final results are known to us, file an additional Form 8-K to publish the final results.

5


 

Forward-Looki ng Statements

This proxy statement contains certain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, relating to future events. Such statements are only predictions and involve risks and uncertainties, resulting in the possibility that the actual events or performance will differ materially from such predictions. For a nonexclusive list of major factors which could cause the actual results to differ materially from the predicted results in the forward looking statements, please refer to the “Risk Factors” in Part I, Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019 and in our periodic reports on Form 10-Q and Form 8-K.

 

 

6


 

Propos al 1

Election of Directors

The following table sets forth certain information regarding our directors, including their ages as of the annual meeting:

 

Class

 

Name

 

Age

 

 

Position Held With the Company

I

 

Michael D. Clayman, M.D.

 

 

68

 

 

President, Chief Executive Officer and Director

I

 

Sandesh Mahatme, LL.M.

 

 

55

 

 

Director

I

 

Ann Merrifield

 

 

69

 

 

Director

II

 

Scott A. Canute

 

 

59

 

 

Director

II

 

Samuel D. Colella

 

 

80

 

 

Director

II

 

Mark Stejbach

 

 

57

 

 

Director

III

 

Heath Lukatch, Ph.D.

 

 

53

 

 

Director

III

 

Patrick J. Mahaffy

 

 

57

 

 

Chairman of the Board and Director

III

 

Alan W. Milinazzo

 

 

60

 

 

Director

 

Classified Board

The Board currently has nine members divided into three classes. Each class consists of one-third of the total number of directors and each class has a three-year term. Vacancies on the Board may be filled only by persons elected by a majority of the remaining directors. A director elected by the Board to fill a vacancy in a class, including vacancies created by an increase in the number of directors, shall serve for the remainder of the full term of that class and until the director’s successor is duly elected and qualified.

There are three directors in Class III, the class whose term of office expires in 2020. Each of the nominees listed below is currently serving as a director of the Company and was previously elected by our stockholders. If elected at the annual meeting, each of these nominees would serve until the 2023 annual meeting of stockholders and until his or her successor has been duly elected and qualified, or, if sooner, until the director’s death, resignation or removal. It is the Company’s policy to encourage its directors and nominees for director to attend the annual meeting. Dr. Clayman, Mr. Colella, Dr. Lukatch, Mr. Mahaffy, Mr. Mahatme, Ms. Merrifield, Mr. Milinazzo and Mr. Stejbach attended the Company’s 2019 annual meeting of stockholders.

Directors are elected by a plurality of the votes of the holders of shares present at the virtual meeting or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on the election of directors. Accordingly, the three nominees receiving the highest number of affirmative votes will be elected. Shares represented by executed proxies will be voted, if authority to do so is not withheld, for the election of the three nominees named below. If any nominee becomes unavailable for election as a result of an unexpected occurrence, shares that would have been voted for that nominee will instead be voted for the election of a substitute nominee proposed by the Company. Each person nominated for election has agreed to serve if elected. The Company’s management has no reason to believe that any nominee will be unable to serve.

The following is a brief biography of each nominee for director and each director whose term will continue after the annual meeting:

Class III Director Nominees for the Election for Three-Year Term Expiring at the 2023 Annual Meeting

Heath Lukatch, Ph.D. has served as one of our directors since 2012. Dr. Lukatch is the Founder and Managing Partner of Red Tree Venture Capital. He currently serves as the Chairman of the board of directors at Inogen, Inc. and Satsuma Pharmaceuticals, Inc., both publicly traded companies, and as Chairman of Engage Therapeutics, Inc. a private biopharmaceutical company.  He also currently serves as a board member at Adynxx, Inc., Halo Neuroscience Inc., SutroVax Inc., Ceribell Inc., ViaCyte, Inc. and ViewPoint Therapeutics, Inc. Previously, Dr. Lukatch was a Partner and Managing Director at TPG Capital from 2015 through March 2020. Prior to joining TPG in 2015, Dr. Lukatch was a Partner at Novo Ventures. During his nine years at Novo, Dr. Lukatch served as Chairman of Cianna Medical, Inc. (acquired by Merit Medical Systems Inc. in 2018), Inogen, NTP, Inc. and Spinifex Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (acquired by Novartis International AG in 2015), as a board member of Amira Pharmaceuticals Inc. (acquired by Bristol-Myers Squibb Company in 2011), AnaptysBio, Inc., Elevation Pharmaceuticals Inc. (acquired by Sunovion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. in 2012), FoldRx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (acquired by Pfizer, Inc. in 2010), InSound Medical, Inc. (acquired by Sonova USA Inc. in 2010), Nora Therapeutics Inc. and Synosia Therapeutics AG (acquired by BioTie Therapies Corp. in 2011) and he was also a board observer at Alios BioPharma Inc. (acquired by Johnson & Johnson Inc. in 2014), Dynavax Technologies Corp., Fluidigm Corporation and SI-Bone, Inc. Prior to joining Novo, Dr. Lukatch was a Managing Director responsible for biotechnology venture investments at Piper Jaffray Ventures and SightLine Partners. Before Piper Jaffray Ventures, Dr. Lukatch worked as a strategy consultant with McKinsey & Company, where he was a leader in McKinsey’s biotechnology practice. Dr. Lukatch also served as co-founder and CEO of AutoMate

7


 

Scientific, Inc., a biotechnology instrumentation company, and he has held scientific positions with Chiron Inc. , Roche Bioscience Plc and Cetus Corporation , doing molecular biology, electrophysiology and protein chemistry, respectively. Dr. Lukatch received his Ph.D. in Neuroscience from Stanford University where he was a D epartment of Defense U . S . A ir F orce Fellow, and his B.A. with high honors in Biochemistry from the University of California at Berkeley . Our Board believes that his extensive industry experience, his experience with venture capital investments, and his experience of serving on the board of directors for several biopharmaceutical and healthcare companies qualifies Dr. Lukatch to serve on o ur Board of Directors.

Patrick J. Mahaffy has served as one of our directors and as Chairman of our Board since 2009. Mr. Mahaffy has served as the President, Chief Executive Officer, and a director of Clovis Oncology, Inc., a biopharmaceutical company, since 2009. He served on the board of Orexigen Therapeutics from 2009 until 2018. Previously, Mr. Mahaffy served as President and Chief Executive Officer and as a member of the board of directors at Pharmion Corporation, a pharmaceutical company that he founded in 2000 and sold to Celgene Corporation in 2008. Mr. Mahaffy is also a trustee of Lewis and Clark College. Mr. Mahaffy earned a B.A. in international affairs from Lewis and Clark College and a M.A. in international affairs from Columbia University. Our Board believes that Mr. Mahaffy’s experience and expertise in the pharmaceutical industry qualifies him to serve on our Board of Directors.

Alan W. Milinazzo has served as one of our directors since 2011. Mr. Milinazzo is a partner in the Global Healthcare and Life Sciences Practice at Heidrick & Struggles International, Inc., a global executive search and leadership consulting firm, a position he has held since January 2016. From 2013 to 2016, he served as President, Chief Executive Officer and a member of the board of directors of InspireMD, Inc., a publicly traded medical device company. From 2006 to 2011, Mr. Milinazzo served as president and chief executive officer of Orthofix International, N.V., a publicly traded global orthopedic company, a position he was promoted to in 2006 after initially being hired as the company’s chief operating officer in 2005. From 2002 to 2005, Mr. Milinazzo served as the General Manager of Medtronic, Inc.’s coronary and peripheral vascular businesses. In 2019, Mr. Milinazzo was appointed executive chairman of the board of directors of Opsens Inc. Mr. Milinazzo also formerly served on the board of directors of CAS Medical Systems, Inc. from 2013, until its acquisition by Edwards Life Sciences Corporation in 2019, LDR Holding Corporation, from 2015 until its acquisition by Zimmer Biomet Holdings in June 2016, and on the board of directors of Orthofix International, N.V. from December 2006 until June 2012. Mr. Milinazzo received his undergraduate degree from Boston College. Our Board believes that Mr. Milinazzo’s expertise in management and marketing in the pharmaceutical and medical device market and his 25 years of experience in the healthcare and life sciences sector qualifies him to serve on our Board of Directors.

The Board of Directors Recommends
a Vote “FOR” Each Named Nominee for Proposal 1

Class I Directors Continuing in Office Until the 2021 Annual Meeting

Michael D. Clayman, M.D. is a co-founder and has served as our President, Chief Executive Officer and as one of our directors since our inception in 2007. Dr. Clayman also serves as the Chairman of the board of directors of both Anokion SA and Ribometrix Inc., both private biopharmaceutical companies. From 2014 to 2018, Dr. Clayman served on the board of directors of Akebia Therapeutics, Inc., a publicly traded biopharmaceutical company. Previously, Dr. Clayman had a lengthy career at Eli Lilly and Company, a global pharmaceutical company, where he was most recently Vice President, Lilly Research Laboratories, and General Manager of Chorus, Lilly’s early-phase development accelerator. During his career at Lilly, Dr. Clayman also led its Global Regulatory Affairs division, the Cardiovascular Discovery Research and Clinical Investigation, Research and Development at Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, a medical device subsidiary of Lilly, the Internal Medicine Division, the Lilly Clinic, Lilly’s dedicated Phase 1 unit, and served as Chair of Lilly’s Bioethics Committee. Prior to his tenure at Lilly, Dr. Clayman was an Assistant Professor in the School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, where his research centered on the immunopathogenesis of renal disease. Dr. Clayman is the recipient of the Physician Scientist Award from the National Institutes of Health. Dr. Clayman earned a B.A., cum laude, from Yale University and an M.D. from the University of California, San Diego School of Medicine. Following an internship and residency in Internal Medicine at the University of California, San Francisco Moffitt Hospitals, Dr. Clayman completed clinical and research fellowships in Nephrology at the University of Pennsylvania. Our Board believes that Dr. Clayman’s clinical and research experience, along with his more than 20 years of experience in pharmaceutical development, qualifies him to serve on our Board of Directors.

Sandesh Mahatme, LL.M. has served as one of our directors since 2014. Mr. Mahatme is the Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Business Officer at Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc., a publicly traded biopharmaceutical company. Mr. Mahatme joined Sarepta in 2012. From January 2006 to November 2012, Mr. Mahatme worked at Celgene Corporation, a publicly traded biopharmaceutical company, where he served in various roles, including Senior Vice President of Corporate Development, Senior Vice President of Finance, Corporate Treasurer and Head of Tax. While at Celgene, Mr. Mahatme built the treasury and tax functions before establishing the Corporate Development Department, focused on strategic, targeted initiatives including commercial development in emerging markets, acquisitions, licensing and global manufacturing expansion. From 1997 to 2005 Mr. Mahatme worked for Pfizer Inc., a pharmaceutical company, where he served in senior roles in business development and corporate tax. Mr. Mahatme started his career at Ernst & Young LLP where he advised multinational corporations on a broad range of transactions. Mr. Mahatme also serves

8


 

on the board of directors of Aeglea Bio T herapeutics, Inc. , a public company, and Elcelyx Therapeutics, Inc., a private biopharmaceutical compan y . Mr. Mahatme earned LL.M. degrees from Cornell Law School and NYU School of Law and is a member of the New York State Bar Association. Our Board believes that Mr. Mahatme’s financial expertise qualifies him to serve on our Board of Directors.

Ann Merrifield has served as one of our directors since 2014. From December 2012 to July 2014, Ms. Merrifield served as President and Chief Executive Officer of PathoGenetix, Inc., a privately held health genomics company, which voluntarily filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy in July 2014. Prior to joining PathoGenetix, Inc., Ms. Merrifield served an 18-year tenure at Genzyme Corporation (now owned by Sanofi S.A.), a diversified, global biotechnology company. At Genzyme, Ms. Merrifield served in a number of leadership roles, including as President of Genzyme Biosurgery, where she led global business strategy across a portfolio of biologics, therapeutic devices and combination products, and as President of Genzyme Genetics, where she played an instrumental role in developing and shaping this diagnostic business. Prior to joining Genzyme, Ms. Merrifield was a Partner at Bain and Company, a global strategy consulting firm, and an Investment Officer at Aetna Life & Casualty. She currently serves as the Chair of the board of directors of InVivo Therapeutics Corporation, a publicly traded biotechnology company, and a member of the board of directors of Lyra Therapeutics, Inc., a private company, since 2019. Ms. Merrifield also serves as trustee of MassMutual Premier, Select and MML Series Investment Funds.  Previously, Ms. Merrifield served as a director of Juniper Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a publicly traded biotechnology company which was acquired by Catalent, Inc. in 2018. Ms. Merrifield earned a B.A. in Zoology and a Master of Education from The University of Maine, and an M.B.A. from the Amos Tuck School of Business at Dartmouth College. Our Board believes that Ms. Merrifield’s commercial expertise specifically in the intra-articular injection field qualifies her to serve on our Board of Directors.

Class II Directors Continuing in Office Until the 2022 Annual Meeting

Scott A. Canute has served as one of our directors since 2015. Mr. Canute served as President of Global Manufacturing and Corporate Operations at Genzyme Corporation from 2010 to 2011. Prior to joining Genzyme, Mr. Canute spent 25 years at Eli Lilly and Company and served as President, Global Manufacturing Operations from 2004 to 2007. Mr. Canute currently serves as Executive Director of Immunomedics, Inc. a publicly trade biopharmaceutical company. Previously, Mr. Canute served as a member of the board of directors of ArTara Therapeutics, Inc. and Akebia Therapeutics, Inc. both publicly traded biopharmaceutical companies. Also, Mr. Canute previously served as a member of the board of directors of AlloCure, Inc., Inspiration Biopharmaceuticals, Inc., Outlook Therapeutics, Inc. (previously Oncobiologics, Inc.), the National Association of Manufacturers and the Indiana Manufacturers Association. Mr. Canute earned a B.S. in chemical engineering from the University of Michigan and an M.B.A. from Harvard Business School. Our Board believes that Mr. Canute’s manufacturing and operational experience in the biopharmaceutical industry and his experience of serving on the board of directors for several biopharmaceuticals companies qualifies Mr. Canute to serve on our Board of Directors.

Samuel D. Colella has served as one of our directors since 2008. Mr. Colella is a Managing Director of Versant Ventures, a healthcare venture capital firm he co-founded in 1999, and has been a general partner of Institutional Venture Partners since 1984. Mr. Colella currently serves as Chairman of the board of directors of Fluidigm Corporation, a publicly traded biotechnology tools company, and is a member of the board of directors of several private companies. Mr. Colella previously served on the board of directors of Genomic Health, Inc., Alexza Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and Veracyte, Inc. Mr. Colella earned a B.S. in business and engineering from the University of Pittsburgh and an M.B.A. from Stanford University. Our Board believes that Mr. Colella’s broad understanding of the life science industry and his extensive experience in working with emerging private and public companies qualifies him to serve on our Board of Directors.

Mark P. Stejbach joined our board of directors in 2016. Mr. Stejbach currently serves as Senior Commercial Advisor at EIP Pharma, Inc. Previously, Mr. Stejbach served as Senior Vice President and Chief Commercial Officer at Alkermes plc, a publicly traded global biopharmaceutical company. Mr. Stejbach has over 30 years of experience in the biotech and pharmaceutical industries, including senior roles in a broad range of commercial functions including marketing, sales, economic affairs, managed care and finance. Prior to his role at Alkermes, Mr. Stejbach served as the Chief Commercial Officer at Tengion, Inc. from 2008 to 2012, and he previously held senior positions at Merck & Co. and Biogen Inc. Mr. Stejbach received his M.B.A. from the Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania and a B.S. in mathematics from Virginia Tech. Our Board believes that Mr. Stejbach’s executive and operational experience in the pharmaceutical industry and commercial expertise qualifies him to serve on our Board of Directors.

9


 

Information Regarding the Board of Directors and Corporate Governance

Independence of the Board of Directors

As required under the Nasdaq Stock Market (“Nasdaq”) listing standards, a majority of the members of our Board must qualify as “independent,” as affirmatively determined by the Board. The Board consults with the Company’s legal counsel to ensure that the Board’s independence determinations are consistent with relevant securities and other laws and regulations regarding the definition of “independent,” including those set forth in the pertinent Nasdaq listing standards, as in effect from time to time.

Consistent with these considerations, after review of all relevant identified transactions or relationships between each director, or any of his or her family members, and the Company, our senior management and our independent auditors, the Board has affirmatively determined that, with the exception of Dr. Clayman, all of the directors are independent directors within the meaning of the applicable Nasdaq listing standards. In making this determination, the Board found that none of these directors or nominees for director had a material or other disqualifying relationship with the Company.

Board Leadership Structure – Position of Board Chair is Separate From the Position Of CEO

The Board has an independent chair, Mr. Mahaffy, who has authority, among other things, to call and preside over Board meetings, including meetings of the independent directors, to set meeting agendas and to determine materials to be distributed to the Board. Accordingly, the Board Chair has substantial ability to shape the work of the Board. The Company believes that separation of the positions of Board Chair and Chief Executive Officer reinforces the independence of the Board in its oversight of the business and affairs of the Company. In addition, the Company believes that having an independent Board Chair creates an environment that is more conducive to objective evaluation and oversight of management’s performance, increasing management accountability and improving the ability of the Board to monitor whether management’s actions are in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders. As a result, the Company believes that having an independent Board Chair can enhance the effectiveness of the Board as a whole.

Role of the Board in Risk Oversight

One of the Board’s key functions is informed oversight of the Company’s risk management process. The Board does not have a standing risk management committee, but rather administers this oversight function directly through the Board as a whole, as well as through various Board committees that address risks inherent in their respective areas of oversight. In particular, the Board is responsible for monitoring and assessing strategic risk exposure, including a determination of the nature and level of risk appropriate for the Company. The audit committee has the responsibility to consider and discuss the major financial risk exposures and the steps the Company’s management has taken to monitor and control these exposures, including guidelines and policies to govern the process by which risk assessment and management is undertaken. The audit committee also monitors compliance with legal and regulatory requirements. The nominating and corporate governance committee monitors the effectiveness of the Company’s corporate governance practices, including whether they are successful in preventing illegal or improper liability-creating conduct. The Company’s compensation committee assesses and monitors whether any of the compensation policies and programs has the potential to encourage excessive risk-taking. Further, the Board is actively monitoring the risks associated with the ongoing public health impact of the novel coronavirus pandemic that causes the COVID-19 disease, particularly as it relates to potential disruptions that could severely impact the Company’s commercialization of ZILRETTA®, on-going and future clinical trials and supply chain.

Meetings of the Board of Directors

The Board of Directors met five times during the last fiscal year. All Board members, except Scott Canute, attended at least 75% of the aggregate number of meetings of the Board, and of the committees on which he or she served, held during the portion of the last fiscal year for which he or she was a director or committee member. Scott Canute was unable to attend two meetings of the Board and two meetings of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee because of a family emergency in each case.

10


 

Information Regarding Committ ees of the Board of Directors

The Board has three standing committees: An Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee and a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The following table provides membership and meeting information for fiscal 2019 for each of the Board committees:

 

Name

 

Audit

 

Compensation

 

Nominating and

Corporate Governance

Scott A. Canute

 

 

 

 

 

X

Samuel D. Colella

 

 

 

X

 

X*

Heath Lukatch, Ph.D.

 

 

 

X

 

 

Patrick J. Mahaffy

 

 

 

X

 

X

Sandesh Mahatme, LL.M.

 

X*

 

 

 

 

Ann Merrifield

 

X

 

 

 

 

Alan W. Milinazzo

 

 

 

X*

 

 

Mark Stejbach

 

X

 

 

 

 

Total meetings in fiscal year 2019

 

4

 

4

 

4

 

*

Committee Chairperson

Below is a description of each standing committee of the Board. Each of the committees has authority to engage legal counsel or other experts or consultants, as it deems appropriate to carry out its responsibilities. The Board has determined that each member of each committee meets the applicable Nasdaq rules and regulations regarding “independence” and each member is free of any relationship that would impair his or her individual exercise of independent judgment with regard to the Company.

11


 

Audit Co mmittee

The Audit Committee of the Board (“Audit Committee”) was established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), to oversee the Company’s corporate accounting and financial reporting processes and audits of its financial statements. For this purpose, the Audit Committee performs several functions, including, among other things:

 

Evaluating the performance, independence and qualifications of our independent auditors and determining whether to retain our existing independent auditors or engage new independent auditors;  

 

Reviewing and approving the engagement of our independent auditors to perform audit services and any permissible non-audit services;

 

Monitoring the rotation of partners of our independent auditors on our engagement team as required by law;

 

Prior to engagement of any independent auditor, and at least annually thereafter, reviewing relationships that may reasonably be thought to bear on their independence, and assessing and otherwise taking the appropriate action to oversee the independence of our independent auditors;

 

Reviewing our annual and quarterly financial statements and reports, including the disclosures contained under the caption “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” and discussing the statements and reports with our independent auditors and management;

 

Reviewing with our independent auditors and management significant issues that arise regarding accounting principles and financial statement presentation and matters concerning the scope, adequacy and effectiveness of our financial and information technology controls;

 

Reviewing with management and our auditors any earnings announcements and other public announcements regarding material developments;

 

Establishing procedures for the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints received by us regarding financial controls, accounting or auditing matters and other matters;

 

Preparing the Audit Committee report that the SEC requires in this proxy statement;

 

Reviewing and providing oversight of any related-person transactions in accordance with our related person transaction policy and reviewing and monitoring compliance with legal and regulatory responsibilities, including our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics;

 

Reviewing our major financial risk exposures, including the guidelines and policies to govern the process by which risk assessment and risk management is implemented;

 

Reviewing on a periodic basis our investment policy; and

 

Reviewing and assessing its performance on a periodic basis.

The Audit Committee is composed of three directors: Mr. Mahatme, Ms. Merrifield and Mr. Stejbach. The Audit Committee met four times during the fiscal year 2019. The Board has adopted a written Audit Committee charter that is available to stockholders on the Company’s website at www.flexiontherapeutics.com.

The Board reviews the Nasdaq listing standards definition of independence for Audit Committee members on an annual basis and has determined that all members of our Audit Committee are independent (as independence is currently defined in Rule 5605(c)(2)(A)(i) and (ii) of the Nasdaq listing standards).

The Board has also determined that Mr. Mahatme qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert,” as defined in applicable SEC rules. The Board made a qualitative assessment of Mr. Mahatme’s level of knowledge and experience based on a number of factors, including his formal education and experience as a chief financial officer for public reporting companies.

12


 

Report of the Audit Commi ttee

The material in this report is not “soliciting material,” is not deemed “filed” with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference in any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) or the Exchange Act, whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation language in any such filing.

The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed the Company’s audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019 with management of the Company. The Audit Committee has discussed with the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm the matters required to be discussed by Auditing Standard No. 1301, Communications with Audit Committees , as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”). The Audit Committee has also received the written disclosures and the letter from the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding the independent accountants’ communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence and has discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm the accounting firm’s independence. Based on the foregoing, the Audit Committee has recommended to the Board of Directors that the Company’s audited financial statements be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019.

Mr. Sandesh Mahatme, LL.M.

Ms. Ann Merrifield

Mr. Mark Stejbach

 

13


 

Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee of the Board (“Compensation Committee”) is currently composed of four directors: Mr. Colella, Dr. Lukatch, Mr. Mahaffy and Mr. Milinazzo. All members of the Company’s Compensation Committee are independent (as independence is currently defined in Rule 5605(d)(2) of the Nasdaq listing standards). The Compensation Committee met four times during fiscal year 2019. The Board has adopted a written Compensation Committee charter that is available to stockholders on the Company’s website at www.flexiontherapeutics.com.

The functions of the Compensation Committee include, among other things:

 

Reviewing, modifying and approving (or if it deems appropriate, making recommendations to the full Board regarding) our overall compensation strategy and policies;

 

Reviewing and approving the compensation and other terms of employment of our executive officers;

 

Reviewing and approving performance goals and objectives relevant to the compensation of our executive officers and assessing their performance against these goals and objectives;

 

Reviewing and approving (or if it deems it appropriate, making recommendations to the full Board regarding) the equity incentive plans, compensation plans and similar programs advisable for us, as well as modifying, amending or terminating existing plans and programs;

 

Evaluating risks associated with our compensation policies and practices and assessing whether risks arising from our compensation policies and practices for our employees are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on us;

 

Reviewing and approving (or if it deems it appropriate, making recommendations to the full Board regarding) the type and amount of compensation to be paid or awarded to our non-employee board members;

 

Establishing policies with respect to votes by our stockholders to approve executive compensation as required by Section 14A of the Exchange Act and determining our recommendations regarding the frequency of advisory votes on executive compensation;

 

Reviewing and assessing the independence of compensation consultants, legal counsel and other advisors to the Committee as required by Section 10C of the Exchange Act;

 

Administering our equity incentive plans;

 

Establishing policies with respect to equity compensation arrangements;

 

Reviewing the competitiveness of our executive compensation programs and evaluating the effectiveness of our compensation policy and strategy in achieving expected benefits to us;

 

Reviewing and approving the terms of any employment agreements, severance arrangements, change of control protections and any other compensatory arrangements for our executive officers;

 

Reviewing the adequacy of its charter on a periodic basis;

 

To the extent applicable, reviewing with management and approving any disclosures under the caption “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” in our periodic reports or proxy statements filed with the SEC;

 

To the extent applicable, preparing a report regarding any disclosures required under the caption “Compensation Discussion and Analysis”; and

 

Reviewing and assessing its performance on a periodic basis.

Compensation Committee Processes and Procedures

The Compensation Committee meets periodically throughout the year and also meets regularly in executive session. From time to time, various members of management and other employees, as well as outside advisors or consultants may be invited by the Compensation Committee to make presentations, to provide financial or other background information or advice or to otherwise participate in Compensation Committee meetings. The Company’s Chief Executive Officer may not participate in, or be present during, any deliberations or determinations of the Compensation Committee regarding his compensation or his individual performance. The charter of the Compensation Committee grants the Compensation Committee full access to all books, records, facilities and personnel of the Company, as well as authority to obtain, at the expense of the Company, advice and assistance from internal and external legal, accounting or other advisors and consultants and other external resources that the Compensation Committee considers necessary or appropriate in the performance of its duties.

14


 

Historically, the Compensation Committee has met at one or more meetings held dur ing the first quarter of the year or during the fourth quarter of the previous year to discuss and, if appropriate, make recommendations to the Board regarding, annual compensation adjustments, annual bonuses, annual equity awards and new performance objec tives. For executives other than the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, the Compensation Committee solicits and considers evaluations and recommendations submitted to it by the Chief Executive Officer. In the case of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, the evaluation of his performance is conducted by the Compensation Committee in consultation with external advisors that may be engaged from time to time. For all executives, as part of its deliberations, the Compensation Committee may review and consider, as appropriate, materials such as financial reports and projections, operational data, executive stock ownership information, company stock performance data, analyses of historical executive compensation levels and current Company-wide compensation levels , compensation surveys and recommendations of any compensation consultant, as applicable.

Generally, the Compensation Committee has designed the Company’s overall executive compensation program to achieve the following objectives:

 

Attempt to attract and retain talented and experienced executives;

 

Motivate and reward executives whose knowledge, skills and performance are critical to our success;

 

Provide a competitive compensation package that aligns the interests of our executive officers and stockholders by including a significant variable component which is weighted heavily toward performance-based rewards;

 

Ensure fairness among executive officers by recognizing the contributions each executive makes to our success; and

 

Foster a shared commitment among executives by aligning their individual goals with our corporate goals and the creation of stockholder value.

The Compensation Committee retained an independent compensation consultant, Radford, an Aon Hewitt company (“Radford”), to assist the Compensation Committee in developing the Company’s overall executive and director compensation programs for 2019, including base pay, bonus percentage and equity awards. To assist in determining executive compensation in 2019, Radford and the Compensation Committee reviewed a peer group of publicly traded companies in the life sciences industry at a stage of development, market capitalization and size comparable to the Company. The Compensation Committee believed these companies were generally comparable to the Company and that the Company competed with these companies for executive talent. In addition to the publicly available information with respect to peer group companies, Radford gathered competitive market data from the Radford Global Life Sciences Survey of public biopharmaceutical companies for the Compensation Committee’s analysis of executive compensation.

The specific determinations of the Compensation Committee with respect to executive compensation for fiscal year 2019 are described in greater detail under the heading “Executive Compensation.”

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

As noted above, the Compensation Committee consists of Mr. Colella, Dr. Lukatch, Mr. Mahaffy and Mr. Milinazzo. No member of the Compensation Committee has ever been an executive officer or employee of the Company. None of the Company’s executive officers currently serves, or has served during the last completed year, on the compensation committee or board of directors of any other entity that has one or more executive officers serving as a member of the Board or Compensation Committee.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board (“Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee”) is currently composed of three directors:  Mr. Canute, Mr. Colella and Mr. Mahaffy. All members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are independent (as independence is currently defined in Rule 5605(a)(2) of the Nasdaq listing standards). The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee met four times during fiscal year 2019. The Board has adopted a written Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee charter that is available to stockholders on the Company’s website at www.flexiontherapeutics.com.

15


 

The function s of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee include, among other things:

 

Identifying, reviewing and evaluating candidates to serve on the Board consistent with criteria approved by our Board of Directors;

 

Determining the minimum qualifications for service on the Board;

 

Evaluating director performance on the Board and applicable committees of the Board and determining whether continued service on the Board is appropriate;

 

Evaluating, nominating and recommending individuals for membership on the Board;

 

Evaluating nominations by stockholders of candidates for election to the Board;

 

Considering and assessing the independence of members of the Board;

 

Developing a set of corporate governance policies and principles, including a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, periodically reviewing and assessing these policies and principles and their application and recommending to the Board any changes to such policies and principles;

 

Considering questions of possible conflicts of interest of directors as such questions arise;

 

Reviewing the adequacy of its charter on an annual basis; and

 

Reviewing and assessing its performance on a periodic basis.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believes that candidates for director should have certain minimum qualifications. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also intends to consider such factors as possessing relevant expertise upon which to be able to offer advice and guidance to management, having sufficient time to devote to the affairs of the Company, demonstrated excellence in his or her field, having the ability to exercise sound business judgment and having the commitment to rigorously represent the long-term interests of the Company’s stockholders. However, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee retains the right to modify these qualifications from time to time. Candidates for director nominees are reviewed in the context of the current composition of the Board, the operating requirements of the Company and the long-term interests of stockholders. In conducting this assessment, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee typically considers diversity, age, skills and such other factors as it deems appropriate, given the current needs of the Board and the Company, to maintain a balance of knowledge, experience and capability.

In the case of incumbent directors whose terms of office are set to expire, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee reviews these directors’ overall service to the Company during their terms, including the number of meetings attended, level of participation, quality of performance and any other relationships and transactions that might impair the directors’ independence. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also takes into account the results of the Board’s self-evaluation, conducted periodically on a group and individual basis. In the case of new director candidates, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also determines whether the nominee is independent for Nasdaq purposes, which determination is based upon applicable Nasdaq listing standards, applicable SEC rules and regulations and the advice of counsel, if necessary. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee conducts any appropriate and necessary inquiries into the backgrounds and qualifications of possible candidates after considering the function and needs of the Board. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee meets to discuss and consider the candidates’ qualifications and then selects a nominee for recommendation to the Board by majority vote.

The Company has adopted a formal policy for receiving and considering director candidates recommended by stockholders. Pursuant to the policy, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will not alter the manner in which it evaluates candidates based on whether or not the candidate was recommended by a stockholder. Stockholders who wish to recommend individuals for consideration by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee to become nominees for election to the Board may do so by delivering a written recommendation to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee at the following address: 10 Mall Road, Suite 301, Burlington, MA 01803, Attn: Corporate Secretary, no later than the 90 th day and no earlier than the 120 th day prior to the one year anniversary of the preceding year’s annual meeting of stockholders. Submissions must include (1) the name and address of the Company stockholder on whose behalf the submission is made; (2) the number of Company shares that are owned beneficially by such stockholder as of the date of the submission; (3) the full name of the proposed candidate; (4) a description of the proposed candidate’s business experience for at least the previous five years; (5) complete biographical information for the proposed candidate; (6) a description of the proposed candidate’s qualifications as a director and (7) any other information required by our Bylaws. Each submission must also be accompanied by the written consent of the proposed candidate to be named as a nominee and to serve as a director if elected. The Company may require any proposed nominee to furnish such other information as the Company may reasonably require to determine the eligibility of such proposed nominee to serve as an independent director of the Company or that could be material to a reasonable stockholder’s understanding of the independence, or lack thereof, of such proposed nominee. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also has the authority to engage third-party search firms to identify and provide information on potential candidates.

16


 

Stockholder Communications with the Board of Directors

The Company has adopted a formal process by which stockholders may communicate with the Board or any of its directors. Pursuant to this policy, stockholders wishing to communicate with the Board or an individual director may send a written communication to the Board or such director c/o Flexion Therapeutics, Inc., 10 Mall Road, Suite 301, Burlington, MA 01803, Attn: Corporate Secretary. Written communications may be submitted anonymously or confidentially and may, at the discretion of the person submitting the communication, indicate whether the person is a stockholder or other interested party. Alternatively, stockholders may submit communications to the Board as a group through the Investor page of our website at https://ir.flexiontherapeutics.com/corporate-governance/contact-the-board.

Each communication will be reviewed by the Company’s Corporate Secretary to determine whether it is appropriate for presentation to the Board or the applicable director. Communications determined by the Secretary to be appropriate for presentation to the Board or the applicable director will be submitted to the Board or such director on a periodic basis. Communications determined by the Corporate Secretary to be inappropriate for presentation will still be made available to any non-management director upon the director’s request.

Code of Ethics

The Company has adopted the Flexion Therapeutics, Inc. Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to all officers, directors and employees. The Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is available on the Company’s website at https://ir.flexiontherapeutics.com . If the Company makes any substantive amendments to the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics or grants any waiver from a provision of the Code to any executive officer or director, the Company will promptly disclose the nature of the amendment or waiver on its website.

 

 


17


 

Prop osal 2

Ratification Of Selection Of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Audit Committee has selected PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2020 and has further directed that management submit the selection of its independent registered public accounting firm for ratification by the stockholders at the annual meeting. PwC has audited the Company’s financial statements since 2010. Representatives of PwC are expected to be present at the annual meeting. They will have an opportunity to make a statement if they so desire and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.

Neither the Company’s Bylaws nor other governing documents or law require stockholder ratification of the selection of PwC as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. However, the Audit Committee is submitting the selection of PwC to the stockholders for ratification as a matter of good corporate practice. If the stockholders fail to ratify the selection, the Audit Committee will reconsider whether or not to retain PwC. Even if the selection is ratified, the Audit Committee, in its discretion, may direct the appointment of different independent auditors at any time during the year if it determines that such a change would be in the best interest of the Company and its stockholders.

The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares present at the virtual meeting or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on the matter at the annual meeting will be required to ratify the selection of PwC.

Principal Accountant Fees and Services

The following table represents aggregate fees billed to the Company for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, by PwC, the Company’s principal accountant:

 

 

 

Fiscal Year Ended

 

Types of Fees

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

Audit Fees (1)

 

$

919,550

 

 

$

783,075

 

Audit-Related Fees

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tax Fees (2)

 

 

30,907

 

 

 

2,103

 

All Other Fees (3)

 

 

2,756

 

 

 

2,756

 

Total Fees

 

$

953,213

 

 

$

787,934

 

 

(1)

“Audit Fees” consist of fees for the audit of the Company’s financial statements and the review of the interim financial statements included in the Company’s quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and audit services provided in connection with other statutory or regulatory filings.

(2)

“Tax Fees” consist of fees for professional services primarily related to tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning.

(3)

“All Other Fees” represent fees associated with access to an on-line accounting research database and disclosure checklist.

In connection with the audit of the Company’s 2019 financial statements, the Company entered into an engagement agreement with PwC that set forth the terms by which PwC performed audit services for the Company.

Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

The Audit Committee has not adopted a policy and procedures for the pre-approval of audit and non-audit services rendered by the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm and consequently all audit and non-audit services are pre-approved by the whole Audit Committee or the Audit Committee Chair.

 

The Board of Directors Recommends
a Vote “For” Proposal 2

18


 

Propos al 3

Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation

We are soliciting a non-binding advisory vote on the compensation of the named executive officers, commonly referred to as a “say-on-pay vote.”

This vote is not intended to address any specific item of compensation, but rather the overall compensation of the Company’s named executive officers and the compensation philosophy, policies and practices described in this proxy statement. The compensation of the Company’s named executive officers subject to the vote is disclosed in the section titled “Executive Compensation” contained in this proxy statement. As discussed therein, the Company believes that its compensation policies and decisions are designed to align executive compensation with the Company’s business objectives and corporate performance, to be consistent with current market practices, and to enable the Company to attract and retain talented and experienced executives to lead the Company successfully in a competitive environment.

Accordingly, our Board of Directors is asking the stockholders to indicate their support for the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers as described in this proxy statement by casting a non-binding advisory vote “For” the following resolution:

“RESOLVED, that the compensation paid to the Company’s named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, including the compensation tables and narrative discussion, is hereby APPROVED.”

Because the vote is advisory, it is not binding on our Board of Directors or the Company. Nevertheless, the views expressed by stockholders, whether through this vote or otherwise, are important to management and the Board of Directors and, accordingly, the Board of Directors and the Compensation Committee intend to consider the results of this vote in making determinations in the future regarding executive compensation arrangements.

Approval of this proposal requires the vote of the holders of a majority of the shares present at the virtual meeting or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on this matter at the Annual Meeting. Abstentions will have the same effect as “Against” votes. Broker non-votes will have no effect.

The Board of Directors Recommends
a Vote “FOR” Proposal 3

19


 

Executive Officers

The following table sets forth certain information regarding our executive officers, including their ages as of the annual meeting:

 

Name

 

Position

 

Age

 

Michael D. Clayman, M.D.

 

President, Chief Executive Officer and Director

 

 

68

 

David Arkowitz

 

Chief Financial Officer

 

 

58

 

Scott Kelley, M.D.

 

Chief Medical Officer

 

 

61

 

Melissa Layman

 

Chief Commercial Officer

 

 

51

 

Mark S. Levine

 

General Counsel and Corporate Secretary

 

 

47

 

Kerry Wentworth

 

Chief Regulatory Officer

 

 

47

 

Christina Willwerth

 

Chief Strategy Officer

 

 

49

 

 

The following is a brief biography of each of our executive officers:

Michael D. Clayman, M.D. is a co-founder of Flexion and has served as our President, Chief Executive Officer and as one of our directors since our inception in 2007. Dr. Clayman also serves as the Chairman of the board of directors of both Anokion SA and Ribometrix Inc., both private biopharmaceutical companies. From 2014 to 2018, Dr. Clayman served on the board of directors of Akebia Therapeutics, Inc., a publicly traded biopharmaceutical company. Previously, Dr. Clayman had a lengthy career at Eli Lilly and Company, a global pharmaceutical company, where he was most recently Vice President, Lilly Research Laboratories, and General Manager of Chorus, Lilly’s early-phase development accelerator. During his career at Lilly, Dr. Clayman also led its Global Regulatory Affairs division, the Cardiovascular Discovery Research and Clinical Investigation, Research and Development at Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, a medical device subsidiary of Lilly, the Internal Medicine Division, the Lilly Clinic, Lilly’s dedicated Phase 1 unit, and served as Chair of Lilly’s Bioethics Committee. Prior to his tenure at Lilly, Dr. Clayman was an Assistant Professor in the School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, where his research centered on the immunopathogenesis of renal disease. Dr. Clayman is the recipient of the Physician Scientist Award from the National Institutes of Health. Dr. Clayman earned a B.A., cum laude, from Yale University and an M.D. from the University of California, San Diego School of Medicine. Following an internship and residency in Internal Medicine at the University of California, San Francisco Moffitt Hospitals, Dr. Clayman completed clinical and research fellowships in Nephrology at the University of Pennsylvania.

David Arkowitz joined Flexion as Chief Financial Officer (CFO) in 2018. Mr. Arkowitz brings more than 25 years of finance and operations leadership experience in the life sciences and biotechnology industries. Prior to joining Flexion, Mr. Arkowitz served as Chief Operating Officer and CFO at Visterra, Inc., a biotechnology company which was acquired by Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., where he led the finance, business development, corporate planning, and other functions. Since 2014, Mr. Arkowitz has also served on the board of directors and as chair of the audit committee of Spring Bank Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a public biopharmaceutical company. In March 2019, Mr. Arkowitz was appointed to the board of directors of Proteostasis Therapeutics, Inc., a public biopharmaceutical company. Previously Mr. Arkowitz was CFO at Mascoma Corporation, AMAG Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Idenix Pharmaceuticals LLC and held additional leadership positions within each company. Preceding his tenure at Idenix, Mr. Arkowitz spent more than 13 years at Merck & Co., Inc. where he held roles of increasing responsibility, including Vice President and Controller of the U.S. operations, Controller of the global research and development division and CFO of the Canadian subsidiary. He obtained his B.A. in mathematics at Brandeis University and his M.B.A. in finance at Columbia University Business School.

Scott Kelley, M.D. was appointed, and assumed the role of, Chief Medical Officer in December 2017 and January 2018, respectively. Dr. Kelley has over 25 years of clinical, academic and industry medical affairs experience. Most recently, Dr. Kelley served as our Vice President of Medical Affairs.  Before joining us in 2016, Dr. Kelley held the position of Vice President, Global Medical Affairs at Sanofi S.A. where he oversaw global data generation, data dissemination and key opinion leader engagement strategy for the biosurgery portfolio including Synvisc®, an injectable product for osteoarthritis of the knee.  Prior to Sanofi, Dr. Kelley led medical affairs functions at Covidien Respiratory & Monitoring Solutions Inc. and at Aspect Medical Systems, Inc. Dr. Kelley earned his B.S. and M.S. from Stanford University and his M.D. from University of California, San Francisco. He completed his residency and fellowship in Anesthesiology at UCSF and obtained board certifications in Anesthesiology and Pain Management. Dr. Kelley maintains a clinical practice at Brigham & Women’s Hospital.

Melissa Layman was appointed as our Chief Commercial Officer (CCO) in March 2020. Ms. Layman has more than 25 years of commercial experience within the life science industry. Over the course of her career Ms. Layman has held positions of increasing responsibility across all areas of commercial operations including sales, marketing, market access functions. Most recently, Ms. Layman served as Vice President, Global Sales and Marketing at Lantheus Medical Imaging Inc. where she was a member of the executive leadership team. During her nearly 10-year tenure, she was responsible for global sales, marketing, communications, health policy, pricing and reimbursement, commercial development and international operations. Prior to Lantheus, she served as Executive Marketing Director

20


 

at Forest Laboratories LLC (now Allergan PLC ), where she led the cardiovascular franchise through the su ccessful launch of its lead product, Bystolic. Previously, Ms. Layman held senior marketing positions at Altus Pharmaceuticals Inc. (now Vertex Inc. ) and Sepracor Inc. (now Sunovion Pharmaceuticals ), where she launched Xopenex MDI and Lunesta, building and integrating the market access function across the business. She began her career with TAP Pharmaceuticals Inc. (now Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A. Inc. ) where her positions ranged from sales representative to National Marketing Director, Gastroenterology a nd Oncology. Ms. Layman holds a B.A. from Ithaca College and an executive M.B.A. from the Kellogg School of Management at Northwestern University.

Mark S. Levine joined us as General Counsel and Corporate Secretary in June 2017. Mr. Levine has more than 20 years of experience counseling companies on general corporate matters, including: strategic corporate development; complex commercial transactions; mergers, acquisitions and divestitures; licensing agreements and corporate partnerships; financings; securities law; corporate governance; and regulatory compliance. Prior to joining us, Mr. Levine served as Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary and a member of the executive management team of Minerva Neurosciences, Inc., a publicly traded biotechnology company. Mr. Levine has also served in senior legal positions at athenahealth, Inc., a network-based health internet technology company; Clinical Data, Inc., a biopharmaceutical company acquired by Forest Laboratories, Inc. in 2011; Wheelabrator Technologies Inc., a renewable energy company; and Xpedior Incorporated, an internet consulting company. Mr. Levine earned his B.A. in political science from Binghamton University, SUNY, and his J.D. from Washington University School of Law in St. Louis.

Kerry Wentworth was appointed as our Chief Regulatory Officer in December 2017 and was previously our Senior Vice President of Regulatory Affairs & Quality. Ms. Wentworth brings more than 20 years of experience in both domestic and international regulatory affairs that spans early and late development across multiple therapeutic areas. Prior to joining us in 2014, Ms. Wentworth served as Vice President, Clinical, Regulatory and Quality at Agenus, Inc., where she was responsible for leading all global regulatory and clinical development efforts for nearly 10 years. Previously, Ms. Wentworth led the Regulatory and Quality function for Genelabs Technologies, Inc., where she was responsible for advancing their lead program through Phase 3 development and into the registration phase with FDA and EMA. Ms. Wentworth also held positions of increasing responsibility within Regulatory Affairs at Genzyme Corporation. Ms. Wentworth holds a B.S. in pre-veterinary medicine from the University of New Hampshire.

Christina Willwerth was named Flexion’s Chief Strategy Officer in January 2019. Ms. Willwerth has more than 25 years of experience in pharmaceutical development. Ms. Willwerth joined Flexion in June 2009. Ms. Willwerth most recently served as our Senior Vice President of Program Management and Strategy and in her expanded role, she continues to lead the planning and execution of our strategic vision and business priorities and is accountable for our portfolio development efforts and Human Resources activities. Ms. Willwerth joined us from Viacell, Inc. where she was a member of the company’s executive management team and served as Vice President, Product Development, with management responsibility for the company’s interdisciplinary cellular therapy and fertility preservation development programs. She previously served as Senior Director, Product Development at The Medicines Company, where she focused on cardiovascular therapy clinical and product development. Prior to that, she held a number of ascendant clinical operations positions at Astra Pharmaceuticals and Biopure Corporation. Ms. Willwerth holds a B.S. in Biology, with high distinction, from Worcester Polytechnic Institute.

 

21


 

Security Ownership Of Certain Be neficial Owners And Management

The following table sets forth certain information regarding the ownership of the Company’s common stock as of March 31, 2020 by: (i) each director and nominee for director; (ii) each of the executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table; (iii) all current executive officers and directors of the Company as a group; and (iv) all those known by the Company to be beneficial owners of more than five percent of the Company’s common stock. Unless otherwise indicated, the address for the following stockholders is c/o Flexion Therapeutics, Inc., 10 Mall Road, Suite 301, Burlington, MA 01803.

 

 

 

Beneficial Ownership (1)

 

 

Beneficial Owner

 

Number   of   Shares

 

 

Percent   of   Total

 

 

5% or greater stockholders

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Miller Value Partners, LLC (2)

 

 

4,932,875

 

 

 

12.79

%

 

Versant Venture Capital III, L.P. and its affiliates (3)

 

 

3,921,092

 

 

 

10.17

%

 

BlackRock, Inc (4)

 

 

3,064,652

 

 

 

7.95

%

 

Capital World Investors (5)

 

 

2,510,700

 

 

 

6.51

%

 

Wasatch Advisors, Inc. (6)

 

 

2,168,857

 

 

 

5.62

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Directors and named executive officers

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Michael D. Clayman, M.D. (7)

 

 

1,712,690

 

 

 

4.34

%

 

Neil Bodick, M.D., Ph.D. (8)

 

 

760,162

 

 

 

1.96

%

 

Scott Kelley, M.D. (9)

 

 

92,436

 

 

*

 

 

Patrick J. Mahaffy (10)

 

 

137,324

 

 

*

 

 

Scott A. Canute (11)

 

 

75,958

 

 

*

 

 

Heath Lukatch, Ph.D. (11)

 

 

34,000

 

 

*

 

 

Sandesh Mahatme, LL.M. (11)

 

 

75,958

 

 

*

 

 

Alan W. Milinazzo (11)

 

 

85,408

 

 

*

 

 

Samuel D. Colella (12)

 

 

4,063,887

 

 

 

10.52

%

 

Ann Merrifield (13)

 

 

85,958

 

 

*

 

 

Mark Stejbach (14)

 

 

63,038

 

 

*

 

 

All current executive officers and directors as a group (15 persons) (15)

 

 

6,963,934

 

 

 

17.03

%

 

 

*

Less than 1% of the outstanding shares of our common stock.

(1)

This table is based upon information supplied by officers, directors and principal stockholders and Schedules 13D and 13G filed with the SEC. Unless otherwise indicated in the footnotes to this table and subject to community property laws where applicable, we believe that each of the stockholders named in this table has sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares indicated as beneficially owned. Applicable percentages are based on 38,562,422 shares of our common stock outstanding on March 31, 2020. In computing percentage ownership of a person, shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options exercisable by such person or RSUs that will vest within 60 days of March 31, 2020 are deemed outstanding. These shares, however, are not deemed outstanding for the purposes of computing the percentage ownership of any other person.

(2)

This information is based solely on the Schedule 13G filed on February 14, 2020 by Miller Value Partners, LLC (“Miller Value”). Miller Value is an investment advisor and is deemed to have sole voting and sole dispositive power over all of such shares. The address of Miller Value’s principal business office is One South Street, Suite 2550, Baltimore, MD 21202.

(3)

Includes (a) 3,511,670 shares held by Versant Venture Capital III, L.P., (b) 20,739 shares held by Versant Side Fund III, L.P. and (c) 388,683 shares held by Versant Development Fund III, LLC (“VDF III”). Brian G. Atwood, Ross A. Jaffe, M.D., Samuel D. Colella, Donald B. Milder, Rebecca B. Robertson, Bradley J. Bolzon, Ph.D., William J. Link, Ph.D., Charles M. Warden, Robin L. Praeger and Barbara N. Lubash, as managing members of Versant Ventures III, LLC, which is the general partner of each of Versant Venture Capital III, L.P., Versant Side Fund III, L.P. and VDF III (collectively, the “Versant Funds”), share voting and investment power over the shares held by the Versant Funds and may be deemed to have indirect beneficial ownership of such shares. The address of the Versant Funds’ principal business office is One Sansome Street, Suite 3630, San Francisco, CA 94104.

( 4 )

This information is based solely on the Schedule 13G/A filed on February 4, 2020 by BlackRock, Inc. (“BlackRock”). BlackRock, a parent holding company filing on behalf of itself and the other reporting persons named on an exhibit therein, reported that it had sole voting power with respect to 2,941,784 of such shares and sole dispositive power with respect to 3,064,652 shares. The address of BlackRock’s principal business office is 55 East 52 nd Street, New York, NY 10055.

22


 

( 5 )

This information is based solely on the Schedule 13G/A filed on February 14, 2020 by Capital World Investors (“Capital World”). Capital World is an investment advisor and is deemed to have sole voting and sole dispositive power over all of such shares. Capital World is a division of Capital Research and Management Company. The address of Capital World’s principal business office is 333 South Hope Street, Los Angeles, CA 90071 .

( 6 )

This information is based solely on the Schedule 13G filed on February 10, 2020 by Wasatch Advisors, Inc. (“Wasatch”). Wasatch is an investment advisor and is deemed to have sole voting and sole dispositive power over and beneficial ownership of all 2,168,857 shares. The address of Wasatch’s principal business office is 505 Wakara Way, Salt Lake City, UT 84108.

( 7 )

Includes 50,374 shares held by Dr. Clayman and 912,684 shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options exercisable within 60 days of March 31, 2020. Also includes (a) 336,349 shares held by the Michael D. Clayman 2006 Revocable Trust, of which Dr. Clayman and his spouse are co-trustees, (b) 24,600 shares held by the Michael D. Clayman 2006 Irrevocable Trust, of which Dr. Clayman and his spouse are co-trustees and (c) 388,683 shares of common stock held by VDF III, of which Dr. Clayman is a manager and minority member. Dr. Clayman disclaims any beneficial ownership of the shares held by VDF III except to the extent of his pecuniary interest in these shares.

( 8 )

Dr. Bodick, formerly Chief Scientific Officer of the Company, ceased serving in this position in connection with his retirement effective January 3, 2020 and currently serves as a consultant to the Company. Includes (a) 68,153 held by Dr. Bodick, (b) 1,000 shares held by Dr. Bodick’s spouse, (c) 302,326 shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options exercisable within 60 days of March 31, 2020 and (d) 388,683 shares of common stock held by VDF III, of which Dr. Bodick is a manager and minority member. Dr. Bodick disclaims any beneficial ownership of the shares held by VDF III except to the extent of his pecuniary interest in these shares.

( 9 )

Includes 18,199 shares held by Dr. Kelley and 74,237 shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options exercisable within 60 days of March 31, 2020.

(10)

Includes 30,824 shares held by Mr. Mahaffy and 106,500 shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options exercisable within 60 days of March 31, 2020.

(1 1 )

Represents shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options exercisable within 60 days of March 31, 2020.

(1 2 )

Includes 25,504 shares held by Mr. Colella and 66,958 shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options exercisable within 60 days of March 31, 2020. Also includes (a) 5,000 shares held by the Colella Family Exempt Marital Deduction Trust, of which Mr. Colella is a trustee and beneficiary, (b) 45,333 shares held by the Colella Family Trust UTA Dtd. 9/21/92, of which Mr. Colella is a trustee and beneficiary, and (c) the shares held by the Versant Funds referred to in footnote (3) above. Mr. Colella disclaims any beneficial ownership of the shares held by the Versant Funds except to the extent of his pecuniary interest therein.

(1 3 )

Includes 10,000 shares held by Ms. Merrifield and 75,958 shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options exercisable within 60 days of March 31, 2020.

(1 4 )

Includes 1,580 shares held by the Mark P. Stejbach Revocable Trust UA 07-08-2016 and 61,458 shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options exercisable within 60 days of March 31, 20120.

(1 5 )

Includes 4,644,262 shares held by all of our current executive officers and directors as a group and 2,319,672 shares that all of our current executive officers and directors as a group have the right to acquire from us within 60 days of March 31, 2020 pursuant to the exercise of stock options and settlement of RSUs. The shares held by Versant Venture Capital III, L.P. and Versant Side Fund III, L.P., which are deemed to be beneficially owned by Mr. Colella and the shares held by VDF III, which are deemed to be beneficially owned by Drs. Bodick and Clayman and Mr. Colella, are counted only once in this total.

 

 

23


 

Executive Compensation

 

The Company is a “smaller reporting company” under Item 10 of Regulation S-K promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, and the following compensation disclosure is intended to comply with the requirements applicable to smaller reporting companies. Although the rules allow the Company to provide less detail about its executive compensation program, the Compensation Committee is committed to providing the information necessary to help stockholders understand its executive compensation-related decisions. Accordingly, this section includes supplemental narratives that describe the 2019 executive compensation program for our “named executive officers.”

Overview

 

We are a biopharmaceutical company focused on the discovery, development and commercialization of novel, local therapies for the treatment of patients with musculoskeletal conditions, beginning with osteoarthritis, or OA, a type of degenerative arthritis. We have an approved product, ZILRETTA, which we market in the United States. We have two product candidates in our pipeline both focused on the local treatment of musculoskeletal conditions: FX201 and FX301. FX201 is a gene therapy product candidate designed to stimulate the production of an anti-inflammatory protein, interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1Ra), with the goal of providing at least one year of pain relief from OA of the knee and improving function. FX301 is a locally administered NaV1.7 inhibitor, known as funapide, formulated for extended release in a thermosensitive hydrogel. The initial development of FX301 is intended to support administration as a peripheral nerve block for management of post-operative pain. We aim to further build our pipeline through internal development and the selective addition of external opportunities.

 

This section discusses our executive compensation decisions for the year ended December 31, 2019 for the individuals who served as our principal executive officer and two other most highly compensated executive officers as of December 31, 2019, referred to as our “named executive officers” for 2019, or NEOs. Our NEOs are the following:

 

Name

Title

Michael D. Clayman, M.D.

President and Chief Executive Officer

Neil Bodick, M.D., Ph.D.

Chief Scientific Officer until January 3, 2020, currently a consultant to the Company

Scott Kelley, M.D.

Chief Medical Officer

 


24


 

Executive Summary

Corporate Performance Highlights

In 2019, we executed on our plans to accelerate ZILRETTA sales, advance ZILRETTA’s life cycle management plans, advance our pipeline, and meet our financial objectives. The Compensation Committee considered the achievements described below in determining achievement of our corporate goals. Certain elements of executive compensation are tied to the level of corporate goal achievement as described further below.

 

Highlights of our performance in 2019 include:

 

ZILRETTA sales and related advancement . The full year sales of ZILRETTA totaled $73.0 million in 2019. Throughout 2019, we tracked and reported key metrics which served to provide visibility into our commercial progress since launching ZILRETTA in November 2017. As of December 31, 2019, 3,488 of our 4,972 target accounts (approximately 70%) had purchased ZILRETTA. Further, 2,642 of ordering accounts had placed at least one reorder for additional product. In addition, 794 of our ordering accounts had made ZILRETTA purchases of more than 50 units; 1,028 accounts had purchased 11-50 units; and 1,666 accounts had purchased between 1-10 units. Ordering accounts purchasing more than 50 ZILRETTA units were responsible for 81% of the total ZILRETTA units purchased (142,789 units) since the launch in November 2017 through December 31, 2019.

 

 

ZILRETTA lifecycle management. On December 26, 2019, we announced that the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (“FDA”) approved the supplemental New Drug Application (“sNDA”) we submitted in 2018 for repeat administration of ZILRETTA. The revised product label removed language which previously stated that ZILRETTA was “not intended for repeat administration” and replaced it with language stating that “the efficacy and safety of repeat administration of ZILRETTA have not been demonstrated”. The FDA determined that because the data were not from a randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial, the Phase 3b results were insufficient to warrant full removal of a Limitation of Use statement. The new label includes a study description and safety data from the Phase 3b repeat administration trial and nonclinical toxicology data from previously submitted single and repeat administration studies in non-diseased animals. In addition, the revised label removed a statement that described a single secondary exploratory endpoint in the original Phase 3 pivotal trial comparing ZILRETTA to immediate release triamcinolone acetonide (TA) crystalline suspension.

 

 

Pipeline advancement . In 2019, we acquired a development-stage Nav1.7 inhibitor known as funapide, which we have formulated with our proprietary thermosensitive hydrogel for control of post-operative pain under our FX301 program. In addition, we made progress with our development of FX201, our gene therapy candidate. In October 2019, the FDA cleared the Investigational New Drug application for FX201. Subsequently, we initiated a Phase 1 first-in-human trial. We have also made advancements in our manufacturing activities for FX201 and FX301.

 

 

Financial objective . We ended 2019 with $136.7 million in cash, which we attained by achieving $73.0 million in ZILRETTA sales as well as receiving approximately $32.0 million in net proceeds pursuant to the amended credit and security agreement we entered into with Silicon Valley Bank, MidCap Financial Trust and Flexpoint MCLS Holdings, LLC on August 2, 2019 (the “Amended Debt Facility”). The Amended Debt Facility provides for a term loan of $40.0 million and a revolving credit facility of up to $20.0 million, both of which mature on January 1, 2024.

25


 

Compensation Highlights

Key features of our executive compensation program include the following:

 

-

We tie pay to performance.  We structure a significant portion of our NEOs’ compensation to be variable, at risk and tied directly to our measurable performance. As an executive’s ability to impact operational performance increases, so does the proportion of his or her at-risk compensation. Target long-term incentive compensation grows proportionately as job responsibilities increase, which encourages our officers to focus on the Company’s long-term success and aligns with the long-term interests of our stockholders. The following charts show the portion of the target 2019 total direct compensation of our Chief Executive Officer and other NEOs that were “at-risk,” which consists of the target annual performance bonus and target long-term equity awards granted in 2019.

 

 

Name

Target Short Term Incentive

 

 

Target Long Term Incentive

 

 

Michael D. Clayman, M.D.

$

1,024,650

 

 

$

3,373,956

 

 

Neil Bodick, M.D., Ph.D.

$

620,897

 

 

$

699,698

 

 

Scott Kelley, M.D.

$

588,004

 

 

$

699,698

 

 

 

86% of our Chief Executive Officer’s total direct target compensation was at risk, with 77% attributable to long-term equity awards and 9% attributable to an annual target bonus award based upon whether we achieved pre-established performance goals. Target short term incentive consists of base salary and target bonus while target long term incentive consists of the grant date fair value of the target equity awards. In 2019, Dr. Clayman’s target equity award included 70,000 performance-vesting stock option awards, which were subject to vesting in the event the Company achieved $75 million in ZILRETTA revenue. Thus, the target long term incentive for Dr. Clayman is based on the grant date fair value of the total target equity award which includes the performance-vesting stock options.

 

-

Our executive bonuses are dependent on meeting key corporate objectives . Our annual performance-based bonus opportunities for all of our NEOs are dependent upon our achievement of annual corporate objectives established each year. No bonuses are guaranteed. For 2019, the Compensation Committee determined that we met 99.5% of our corporate goals and awarded our NEOs’ bonuses equivalent to 99.5% of each of their target bonuses.

 

 

-

We emphasize long-term equity incentives. Equity awards are an integral part of our executive compensation program and comprise the primary at-risk portion of our NEO compensation package. We have traditionally granted stock options to our NEOs and in 2018, we introduced restricted stock units (RSUs) into our annual grant program. These awards strongly align our executive officers’ interests with those of our stockholders by providing a continuing financial incentive to maximize long-term value for our stockholders and by encouraging our executive officers to remain in our long-term employ.

 

 

-

We have introduced performance- vesting awards. In 2019, we introduced performance-vesting awards to our Chief Executive Officer as a part of his annual grant. Under the 2019 grant, the performance-vesting portion of his award would only vest if we achieved a stretch ZILRETTA revenue goal and because we did not achieve that goal in full, the performance-vesting portion of the award was forfeited in its entirety. In 2020, we continued to include a performance vesting component in our Chief Executive Officer’s annual equity grant and increased the amount subject to performance vesting to approximately 60% of the total value of his annual grant.

 

26


 

 

-

Change of control payments are limited to double-trigger payments which require termination other than for cause or resignation for good reason in connection with a change of control to trigger payments.

 

 

-

We do not have contracts that provide our executive officers with any excise tax or other tax gross ups.

 

 

-

We generally do not provide any special executive fringe benefits or perquisites to our executives, such as car allowances, personal security, or financial planning advice. Our executives are generally eligible to participate in the same benefits as our other employees.

 

 

-

The Compensation Committee has retained an independent third-party compensation consultant for guidance in making compensation decisions. The compensation consultant advises the Compensation Committee on market practices, including identifying a peer group of companies and their compensation practices, so that the Compensation Committee can regularly assess the Company's individual and total compensation programs against these peer companies, the general marketplace and other industry data points.

 

 

-

We prohibit any and all hedging and pledging of Company stock .

Overview of Our Executive Compensation Program

The Compensation Committee conducts oversight of our compensation program and policies. Our executive compensation philosophy is based on the following objectives:

 

Aligning executive interests and stockholder interests through long-term incentives linked to Company performance;

 

Attracting, retaining and motivating superior executive talent who exemplify and enhance Company culture; and

 

Providing incentives that reward the achievement of performance goals that directly correlate to the enhancement of stockholder value, as well as to facilitate executive retention.

27


 

Our executive compensation program generally consists of the following thr ee principal components: base salary, annual performance-based bonuses and long-term incentive compensation. We also provide our executive officers with severance and change-in-control payments and benefits, as well as other benefits generally available to all our employees, including retirement benefits under the company's 401(k) plan and participation in employee benefit plans. The following table summarizes the three principal components of compensation, their objectives and key features.

 

Element of
Compensation

 

Objectives

 

Key Features

Base Salary (fixed cash)

 

Provides financial stability and security through a fixed amount of cash for performing job responsibilities.

 

Reviewed and determined based on a number of factors including individual performance, internal equity, retention, expected cost of living increases and the overall performance of our company, and by reference to market data provided by the Compensation Committee’s compensation consultant.

Annual Performance Bonus (at-risk cash)

 

Motivates and rewards for attaining rigorous annual corporate performance goals that relate to our key business objectives.

 

Target annual performance bonus opportunities, expressed as a percentage of base salary, are reviewed annually and determined based upon positions that have similar impact on the organization and competitive bonus opportunities in our market. Actual bonus payments are based upon specific corporate performance determined by the Compensation Committee, as well as other performance factors that the Compensation Committee deems relevant.

Long-Term Incentive (at-risk equity)

 

Motivates and rewards for long-term company performance; aligns executives’ interests with stockholder interests and changes in stockholder value.

 

Attracts highly qualified executives and encourages continued employment over the long-term.

 

Annual equity awards are reviewed and determined at the beginning of each year or as appropriate during the year for new hires, promotions or rewards for significant achievement.

 

Individual awards are determined based on a number of factors, including current corporate and individual performance, outstanding equity holdings and their retention value and total ownership, historical value of our stock, internal equity among executives and competitive market data provided by the Compensation Committee’s compensation consultant.

 

Equity awards are provided in the form of stock options which vest 25% on the first anniversary of the vesting commencement date and 1/48 vest monthly thereafter and/or restricted stock units which vest in annual installments rather than monthly over a four-year period subject to continued service with us. Equity awards may also vest based on performance goals including, for our Chief Executive Officer. Stock options and restricted stock units are key aspects of our “pay-for-performance” philosophy, providing a return that increases as the market price of our stock appreciates and, in the case of performance-vesting equity, only if we meet designated performance goals.

 

In evaluating our executive compensation program and policies, as well as the short- and long-term value of our executive compensation plans and arrangements, the Compensation Committee focuses on providing a competitive compensation package that provides significant short- and long-term incentives for the achievement of measurable corporate objectives and individual contribution towards our corporate performance. We believe that this approach provides an appropriate blend of short- and long-term incentives to maximize stockholder value.

 

We do not currently have formal policies for allocating compensation among base salary, annual performance bonuses and equity awards, short- and long-term compensation or among cash and non-cash compensation. Instead, the Compensation Committee uses its judgment to establish a target total direct compensation opportunity for each named executive officer that is a mix of current, short- and long-term incentive compensation, and cash and non-cash compensation, that it believes appropriate to achieve the goals of our executive compensation program and our corporate objectives. A significant portion of our NEOs’ target total direct compensation opportunity is comprised of “at-risk” compensation in the form of an annual performance bonus opportunity and equity awards tied to stockholder returns, in order to align the executive officers’ incentives with the interests of our stockholders and our corporate goals.

28


 

How We Determine Executive Compensation

The Compensation Committee reviews and makes decisions with respect to all compensation paid to our executive officers, including our NEOs. The Chief Executive Officer evaluates and provides to the Compensation Committee performance assessments and compensation recommendations. In making his recommendations, the Chief Executive Officer reviews various third-party compensation surveys and compensation data provided by the independent compensation consultant to the Compensation Committee, as described below. While the Chief Executive Officer discusses his recommendations with the Compensation Committee and the Board, he does not participate in the deliberations concerning, or the determination of, his own compensation. The Compensation Committee or the Board discusses and makes final determinations with respect to executive compensation matters without the Chief Executive Officer present during discussions of the Chief Executive Officer’s compensation. From time to time, various other members of management and other employees as well as outside advisors or consultants may be invited by the Compensation Committee or the Board to make presentations, provide financial or other background information or advice or otherwise participate in the Compensation Committee or Board meetings.

The Compensation Committee meets periodically throughout the year to manage and evaluate our executive compensation program and determines the principal components of compensation (base salary, performance bonus and equity awards) for our executive officers on an annual basis, typically at the beginning of each fiscal year; however, decisions may occur during the year for new hires, promotions or other special circumstances as the Compensation Committee determines appropriate. Neither the Board nor the Compensation Committee delegates authority to approve executive officer compensation. The Compensation Committee does not maintain a formal policy regarding the timing of equity awards to our executive officers; awards are generally approved at a meeting of the Compensation Committee in January of each year.

The Compensation Committee has the sole authority to retain compensation consultants to assist in its evaluation of executive compensation, including the authority to approve the consultant’s reasonable fees and other retention terms. In fiscal year 2019, we retained Radford, which is part of the Rewards Solutions practice at Aon plc, to provide executive compensation consulting services to the Compensation Committee and assist it in reviewing our executive compensation programs, making compensation decisions for each of our executive officers and ensuring that our compensation programs remain competitive in attracting and retaining talented executives. The compensation consultant reports directly to the Compensation Committee, which maintains the authority to direct its work and engagement. The compensation consultant interacts with management to gain access to company information that is required to perform its services and to understand the culture and policies of our organization.

 

Radford’s engagement with respect to 2019 executive compensation decisions included conducting a review of the design and competitive positioning of our compensation programs for our Chief Executive Officer, other executive officers and non-employee directors in preparation for making compensation decisions for 2019, reviewing our aggregate long-term incentive practices and updating its prior compensation study regarding equity grant practices. As part of the in-depth review for 2019 compensation, Radford provided the Compensation Committee with the following services, which the Compensation Committee used to make decisions related to compensation for 2019:

 

reviewed and provided an analysis of the compensation arrangements for all of our NEOs, including the design and structure of our annual cash incentive bonus plan and equity-based incentive compensation program;

 

advised on the design and structure of our cash and equity incentive compensation programs;

 

prepared an analysis of our share usage under our equity incentive plan;

 

updated the Compensation Committee on emerging trends and best practices in the area of executive and Board compensation;

 

provided recommendations and assisted with developing our peer group;

 

provided compensation data for similarly situated executive officers at companies in our peer group; and

 

reviewed and provided recommendations on the compensation program for our non-employee directors.

 

The Compensation Committee considered whether the work of Radford raised any conflict of interest, taking into account the following factors: (i) the amount of fees paid to the compensation consultant, as a percentage of the firm’s total revenue; (ii) the provision of other services to us by the compensation consultant; (iii) the compensation consultant’s policies and procedures that are designed to prevent conflicts of interest; (iv) any business or personal relationship of the individual compensation advisors with any member of the Compensation Committee; (v) any business or personal relationship of the compensation consultant or the individual compensation advisors employed by the firm with any of our executive officers or any members of the Compensation Committee and (vi) any shares of our common stock owned by the compensation consultant or the individual compensation advisors employed by the firm. Based on these factors, the Compensation Committee concluded that the work of Radford and the individual compensation advisors employed by Radford did not create any conflict of interest.

29


 

Peer Group and Market Data

In addition to Company performance, the Compensation Committee also considers market data from similar companies in our industry. The Compensation Committee engaged Radford to work with the Compensation Committee in order to define a peer group to use to assist in setting NEO compensation for 2019.

 

Radford performed an analysis and compiled a list of 20 peer companies that are comparable to the Company in terms of business activities, revenue and size. Radford proposed a group of specialty pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies of a similar size (revenue, headcount, and market value) and stage to the Company . The Compensation Committee approved this peer group (listed in the table below) at the end of 2018 and utilized the peer group as a factor in making 2019 compensation decisions for our NEOs.

 

Peer Group Companies 2019

Aerie Pharmaceuticals

Pacira Pharmaceuticals

Anika Therapeutics

Portola Pharmaceuticals

Array BioPharma

Radius Health

Clovis Oncology

Retrophin

Collegium Pharmaceutical

Sorrento Therapeutics

Corcept Therapeutics

Supernus Pharmaceuticals

Halozyme Therapeutics

Synergy Pharmaceuticals

Heron Therapeutics

Tesaro

Insys Therapeutics

Vanda Pharmaceuticals

Omeros

Vericel

 

Radford completed an assessment of executive compensation data based on our 2019 peer group to inform the Compensation Committee’s determinations of executive compensation for 2019. The data used for this assessment was compiled from (i) the 2019 peer group companies’ publicly disclosed information, or public peer data and (ii) data from the Radford Global Life Sciences Survey with respect to the 2019 selected peer group companies listed above, or the peer survey data. The components of the market data were based on the availability of sufficient comparative data for an executive officer’s position. The peer survey data and the public peer data are collectively referred to as market data, and was reviewed by the Compensation Committee, with the assistance of Radford, and used as a reference point, in addition to other factors, in setting our named executive officers’ compensation.

 

Radford prepared, and the Compensation Committee reviewed, a range of market data reference points (generally at the 25th, 50th, and 75th percentiles of the market data) with respect to base salary, performance bonuses, equity compensation (value based on an approximation of grant date fair value), total target cash compensation (including both base salary and the annual target performance bonus) and total direct compensation (total target cash compensation and equity compensation).

 

The Compensation Committee’s general aim is for compensation to remain competitive with the market, falling above or below the median of the market data as appropriate based on corporate and individual executive performance, and other factors deemed to be appropriate by the Compensation Committee. Due to our limited history as a public company and our evolving and growing business, we have not developed a specific market positioning or “benchmark” that we consistently aim for in setting compensation levels; instead the Compensation Committee determines each element of compensation, and total target cash and direct compensation, for each named executive officer based on various facts and circumstances appropriate for our company in any given year. Competitive market positioning is only one of several factors, as described below under “Factors Used in Determining Executive Compensation,” that the Compensation Committee considers in making compensation decisions, and therefore individual named executive officer compensation may fall at varying levels as compared to the market data.

 

30


 

In preparation for making 20 20 executive compensation decisions, Radford assisted the Compensation Committee in reviewing its peer group and making adjustments. The recommended change s were made due to certain companies on the peer group list above having experienced material changes in market cap , M&A activity or submitted a bankruptcy filing .

 

Peer Group Companies 2020

Aerie Pharmaceuticals

Omeros

Akebia Therapeutics

Pacira BioSciences

Anika Therapeutics

Portola Pharmaceuticals

Collegium Pharmaceutical

Radius Health

Corcept Therapeutics

Retrophin

Dermira

Rigel Pharmaceuticals

Eagle Pharmaceuticals

Sorrento Therapeutics

Halozyme Therapeutics

Supernus Pharmaceuticals

Heron Therapeutics

Vanda Pharmaceuticals

Karyopharm Therapeutics

Vericel

 

Factors Used in Determining Executive Compensation

The Compensation Committee sets the compensation of our executive officers at levels the Committee determines to be competitive and appropriate for each named executive officer, using the Committee’s professional experience and judgment. Compensation decisions are not made by use of a formulaic approach; the Compensation Committee believes that these decisions require consideration of a multitude of relevant factors that may vary from year to year. In making executive compensation decisions, the Compensation Committee generally takes into consideration the following factors:

 

our corporate performance and business needs

 

each NEO’s individual performance, experience, job function, change in position or responsibilities, and expected future contributions to our company

 

internal pay equity among our named executive officers and positions

 

the need to attract new talent to our executive team and retain existing talent in a highly competitive industry

 

a range of market data reference points, as described above under “Peer Group and Market Data”

 

the total compensation cost and stockholder dilution from executive compensation actions

 

trends and compensation paid to similarly situated executives within our market

 

its compensation consultant’s recommendations

 

a review of each named executive officer’s total targeted and historical compensation and equity ownership

 

our CEO’s recommendations, based on the CEO’s direct knowledge of the performance of each NEO and the CEO’s review of competitive market data

SUMMARY Compensation Table

The following table shows for the fiscal years ended 2019 and 2018, compensation awarded to, paid to, or earned by, the Company’s NEOs:  

 

Name and Principal Position

 

Year

 

Salary

($)

 

 

Bonus (1)

($)

 

 

Option

Awards (2)

($)

 

 

Stock Awards ($)

 

 

All Other

Compensation

($)

 

 

Total

($)

 

Michael D. Clayman, M.D.

 

2019

 

 

621,000

 

 

 

401,631

 

 

 

2,717,909

 

 

 

 

 

 

36,820

 

(3)

 

3,777,361

 

President, CEO and Co-Founder

 

2018

 

 

600,000

 

 

 

252,000

 

 

 

1,687,681

 

 

 

650,716

 

 

 

31,234

 

 

 

3,221,631

 

Neil Bodick, M.D., Ph.D.

 

2019

 

 

443,498

 

 

 

176,512

 

 

 

168,698

 

 

 

531,000

 

 

 

37,588

 

(4)

 

1,357,295

 

Former Chief Scientific Officer and Co-Founder (6)

 

2018

 

 

428,500

 

 

 

137,120

 

 

 

578,632

 

 

 

223,100

 

 

 

36,438

 

 

 

1,403,790

 

Scott Kelley, M.D.

 

2019

 

 

420,003

 

 

 

167,161

 

 

 

168,698

 

 

 

531,000

 

 

 

39,370

 

(5)

 

1,326,232

 

Chief Medical Officer

 

2018

 

 

400,000

 

 

 

128,000

 

 

 

482,189

 

 

 

185,910

 

 

 

12,558

 

 

 

1,022,747

 

 

(1)

Annual bonuses are granted after the completion of each calendar year at the Compensation Committee’s discretion, taking into account the Company’s performance against corporate goals as described above under “Annual Performance-Based Bonus Opportunity.”  

31


 

(2)

In accordance with SEC rules, this column reflects the aggregate grant date fair value of the option awards granted during the respective fiscal year computed in accordance with Financial Accounting Standard Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718 for stock-based compensation transactions , or ASC 718 . Assumptions used in the calculation of these amounts are included in Note 14 to our consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report filed on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 12, 2020 . Due solely to the timing of grant dates of awards as determined by the Compensation Committee, the 201 8 awards in this column include awards based on performance during fiscal 201 7 that were granted in February 2018 . Due to the timing of the grant dates of the awards, the 2019 awards in this column include awards based on performance during fiscal year 201 8 that were granted in March 2019 . Also due to the timing of grant dates of awards as determined by the Compensation Committee, awards based on performance during fiscal 201 9 were granted in March 20 20 and , as a result, are not included . A portion of Dr. Clayman’s stock options granted in 2019 included performance- vesting stock option awards subject to vesting in the event the Company achieved $75 million in ZILRETTA revenue (the “Milestone”). The g rant date fair value of such performance-vesting stock options was determined to be $0 under ASC 718 based upon a determination that as of the grant date, it was not probable that the Milestone would be achieved. The grant date fair value of such performan ce-vesting stock options , based on achieving the maximum level of performance under the awards as of the grant date, under ASC 718 would be $3,373,956 for Dr. Clayman. The Milestone was not achieved in 2019 and all 70,000 of such performance-based stock op tion awards were cancel l ed and forfeited. Thus, the grant date fair value of the 290,000 stock options actually granted is $2,717,909.

( 3 )

Amounts for 2019 consist of the following: (i) $5,925 for life insurance premiums, (ii) $17,583 for health, dental and vision insurance premiums, (iii) $712 for long-term disability premiums, and (iv) $12,600 of matching and safe harbor contributions to our 401(k) plan. For more information regarding these benefits, see above under “Perquisites, Health, Welfare and Retirement Benefits.”

( 4 )

Amounts for 2019 consist of the following: (i) $4,003 for life insurance premiums, (ii) $24,473 for health, dental and vision insurance premiums, (iii) $712 for long-term disability premiums, and (iv) $8,400 of safe harbor contributions to our 401(k) plan. For more information regarding these benefits, see above under “Perquisites, Health, Welfare and Retirement Benefits.”

( 5 )

Amounts for 2019 consist of the following: (i) $3,363 for life insurance premiums, (ii) $24,473 for health, dental and vision insurance premiums, (iii) $712 for long-term disability premiums, and (iv) $10,823 of matching and safe harbor contributions to our 401(k) plan. For more information regarding these benefits, see above under “Perquisites, Health, Welfare and Retirement Benefits.”

(6)

Dr. Bodick retired as the Chief Scientific Officer of the Company effective as of January 3, 2020.

 

Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table

Base Salary

The Compensation Committee approved the following 2019 base salaries for each of the NEOs, which were effective as of January 1, 2019.

 

Name

 

2019 Base

Salary

($)

 

 

% Change from 2018 Base Salary

 

Michael D. Clayman, M.D.

 

 

621,000

 

 

3.5%

 

Neil Bodick, M.D., Ph.D.

 

 

443,498

 

 

3.5%

 

Scott Kelley, M.D.

 

 

420,003

 

 

5.0%

 

 

The Compensation Committee determined the salary adjustments for Dr. Clayman, Dr. Bodick and Dr. Kelley based on the amount the Compensation Committee determined was appropriate, taking into account the market data in addition to an evaluation of each NEO’s and the Company’s performance. Dr. Bodick’s 2019 salary increase reflects a market average merit increase. Dr. Clayman’s base salary adjustment was based primarily on market data for peer group CEOs and reflects the Compensation Committee’s determination to bring his base salary closer to the median level. Dr. Kelley’s base salary adjustment was based primarily on market data for peer group chief medical officers and reflects the Compensation Committee’s determination to bring his base salary closer to the median level.

 

Annual Performance-Based Bonus Opportunity - Cash Bonus

For 2019, the Compensation Committee applied its annual performance-based bonus program for the NEOs based on each NEO’s individual target bonus, as a percentage of base salary, or target bonus percentage, and the extent to which the Company achieved key 2019 corporate goals.

32


 

In early 2019 , the Compensation Committee reviewed the target bonu s percentages for each of our NEOs and increased our Chief Executive Officer’s target bonus percentage to 65 % and determined that each of our other NEO’s target bonus percentage s should remain at 40% to promote internal equity and consistency across the ex ecutive team. Each NEO’s 201 9 target bonus percentage approved by the Compensation Committee is set forth below:

 

Name

 

Target Bonus

(%   of   Base   Salary)

 

Target Amount

 

Michael D. Clayman, M.D.

 

65%

 

$

403,650

 

Neil Bodick, M.D., Ph.D.

 

40%

 

$

177,399

 

Scott Kelley, M.D.

 

40%

 

$

168,001

 

 

The 2019 corporate goals were determined by the Board after recommendation by the Compensation Committee and communicated to the NEOs in early 2019. The 2019 annual goals are comprised of the Company’s corporate goals and various business accomplishments tied to the Company’s overall strategic objectives. Although the cash bonus amount paid to NEOs is based on Company performance, the Compensation Committee retained the discretion to adjust bonus payouts for individual performance or other factors they determined appropriate and material to the Company’s corporate performance, including events or circumstances that arise after the original corporate goals were set and/or overall value created for stockholders during the year. The Compensation Committee did not exercise any discretion in adjusting NEO bonuses from achievement of corporate goals for 2019.

The 2019 corporate goals established by the Board for our NEO performance bonus program, their associated weightings and actual achievement percentages are set forth in the following chart. The Compensation Committee based the percent achievement on a combination of objective performance and the Compensation Committee’s qualitative assessment of Company performance.

 

2019 Corporate Goal

% Weighting

2019 Achievement

% Achievement

Meet/exceed ZILRETTA revenue goal of $75M

60%

In 2019 we achieved ZILRETTA revenue of $73 million, compared to our target of $75 million. The Compensation Committee determined that we achieved 97.5% of our goal.

58.5%

Execute our life cycle management plan

10%

The Compensation Committee determined that the life cycle management execution, which included securing approval of the sNDA for ZILRETTA to revise the Limitation of Use statement, or LOU, to an improved position met our objectives and that we achieved 100% of our goal.

10%

Achieve FX201 milestones (as warranted by tox data)

10%

The Compensation Committee determined that the advancement of FX201, including the initiation of our first-in-human study, met our objectives and that we achieved 100% of our goal.

10%

Add at least one new asset to the portfolio

10%

The Compensation Committee determined that the acquisition of the Nav1.7 inhibitor, funapide, and development of a novel thermosensitive polymeric hydrogel formulation for local delivery of funapide met our objectives and that we achieved 100% of our goal.

10%

End 2019 with at least $90M cash balance

10%

The Compensation Committee determined that we exceeded this goal because our cash as of December 31, 2019 was $137 million, which includes the $32 million received in net proceeds from the Amended Debt Facility secured in 2019.

11%

Total 2019 Achievement

100%

 

99.5%

 

33


 

The following table shows each NEO’s actual 201 9 bonus amount, which was paid in 2020 , the percentage of such bonus that the Compensation Committee determined was achieved and the actual amount of 201 9 bonuses that were paid to the NEOs:

 

Name

 

Actual Bonus Awarded ($)

 

 

Actual Bonus Awarded (% of Target Bonus)

 

Michael D. Clayman, M.D.

 

$

401,631

 

 

99.5%

 

Neil Bodick, M.D., Ph.D.

 

$

176,512

 

 

99.5%

 

Scott Kelley, M.D.

 

$

167,161

 

 

99.5%

 

 

Equity-Based Incentive Awards

We have historically granted equity awards to our NEOs in the form of stock options. In connection with its 2019 compensation decisions, the Compensation Committee, in consultation with Radford, evaluated the appropriate form of equity compensation and determined that our long-term incentive compensation program for our NEOs should be adjusted to incorporate RSUs as well as stock options. The Compensation Committee believes that stock options are inherently performance-based, and automatically link executive pay to stockholder return, as the value realized, if any, from an award of stock options is dependent upon, and directly proportionate to, appreciation in stock price. Regardless of the reported value in the Summary Compensation Table, our NEOs will only receive value from their stock option awards if the price of our common stock increases above the price of our common stock at the time of the stock option grant and remains above such price as the stock options continue to vest. The Compensation Committee also believes adding RSUs is appropriate because these awards cover fewer shares than stock options, minimize dilution to our stockholders, provide a return based directly on the market price of our shares, provide retention value and are used by more than half of our peer group.

The 2019 equity awards granted to our NEOs are reflected in the table below. The Compensation Committee approved the grant of these awards in March 2019 to the NEOs.

 

Name

 

Stock Options

 

Restricted Stock Units (RSUs)

 

Michael D. Clayman, M.D.

 

 

360,000

 

-

 

Neil Bodick, M.D., Ph.D.

 

 

18,000

 

 

36,000

 

Scott Kelley, M.D.

 

 

18,000

 

 

36,000

 

 

In determining the size of the 2019 equity-based award grants for the NEOs, the Compensation Committee considered market data, burn-rate of stock grants issued versus shares outstanding, and the incentive and retentive qualities of the various types of equity-based awards. For all NEOs except our Chief Executive Officer, t he Compensation Committee believed the mix of one-third (1/3) stock options and two-thirds (2/3) RSUs provided the appropriate balance to align the NEOs’ interests with those of our stockholders. With respect to our Chief Executive Officer, the Compensation Committee determined it was appropriate that he receive his annual grant in options, noting he had received RSUs in 2018, but structured his option grant so that a portion of it would only vest based on achievement of a stretch ZILRETTA revenue performance goal, in order to further align our Chief Executive Officer’s interests with stockholder value.

All of the 2019 stock options and RSU awards were granted pursuant to the 2013 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2013 Plan”). All options were granted with a per share exercise price equal to no less than the fair market value of a share of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant of each award. The stock option awards (other than a portion of our Chief Executive Officer’s stock option award, as described below) and RSU awards each vest over a four-year period, with RSUs vesting 25% on each of the first four anniversaries of the vesting commencement date and stock options vesting 25% on the first anniversary of the vesting commencement date and 1/48 th vesting monthly thereafter until fully vested, and accelerate vesting upon the occurrence of a change of control and the option holder’s termination of service under certain circumstances.  

As previously noted, in 2019 the Compensation Committee included performance-vesting stock options in our Chief Executive Officer’s annual equity award. 70,000 of our Chief Executive Officer’s 360,000 total stock options award were contingent upon the Company achieving $75 million in ZILRETTA revenue in 2019. Although the Company achieved ZILRETTA revenues representing over 97% of this target, because the target was not fully met, the 70,000 performance-vesting stock options were forfeited and cancelled in their entirety, leaving only the remaining 290,000 stock options subject to time-based vesting, which maintained our Chief Executive Officer’s equity compensation at the 50 th market percentile. In 2020, we continued to include a performance-vesting component in our Chief Executive Officer’s annual equity grant and increased the amount subject to performance-vesting to approximately 60% of the total value of his annual grant which was in the form of RSUs.

34


 

Other Features of Our Compensation Pro gram

 

Executive Employment Agreements

We maintain offer letters or employment agreements with each of our NEOs (with respect to Dr. Bodick, prior to his retirement in January 2020). Each offer letter or employment agreement provides for “at-will” employment and describes such NEO’s base salary, discretionary cash bonus target, and any equity-based or cash-based grant, including inducement grants. This compensation and any performance-based and annual changes to this compensation are subject to review by the Compensation Committee. Each NEO’s offer letter or employment agreement also describes the benefits available, conditions of employment, severance eligibility and change of control severance benefits. In January 2020, we entered into a separation agreement with Dr. Bodick that superseded the terms of his employment letter agreement. The terms of these letters and agreements are described below:

 

      Employment Agreement with Dr. Clayman. We entered into a letter agreement with Dr. Clayman in November 2007 setting forth the terms of his employment, subsequently amended and restated the agreement in September 2013 and further amended the agreement in March 2014. Pursuant to his agreement, Dr. Clayman’s 2013 annual base salary was $437,091, subject to increase by the Board, and he is eligible to receive an annual cash performance bonus based on a percentage of his base salary as described above under “Annual Performance-Based Bonus Opportunity – Cash Bonus.” Dr. Clayman is additionally entitled to certain severance and change of control benefits, the terms of which are described above under “Severance and Change of Control Benefits.”

 

       Employment Agreement with Dr. Bodick . We entered into a letter agreement with Dr. Bodick in November 2007 setting forth the terms of his employment, subsequently amended and restated the agreement in September 2013 and further amended the agreement in March 2014. Pursuant to his agreement, Dr. Bodick’s 2013 annual base salary was $327,818, subject to increase by the Board, and he is eligible to receive an annual cash performance bonus based on a percentage of his base salary as described above under “Annual Performance-Based Bonus Opportunity – Cash Bonus.”

 

        Employment Agreement with Dr. Kelley. Dr. Kelley was appointed the Company’s Chief Medical Officer in December 2017 and commenced employment under this position on January 1, 2018. Pursuant to his agreement, Dr. Kelley’s annual base salary for 2018 was $400,000 and he is eligible to receive an annual cash performance bonus based on a percentage of his base salary as described above under “Annual Performance-Based Bonus Opportunity – Cash Bonus.”  Dr. Kelley is additionally entitled to certain severance and change of control benefits, the terms of which are described above under “Severance and Change of Control Benefits.”

 

Severance and Change of Control Benefits

Under the terms of their offer letters, employment agreements and our Change of Control Severance Benefit Plan, each of the NEOs (other than Dr. Bodick, who retired effective January 3, 2020) is eligible for severance benefits (cash payments, payments for COBRA premiums and equity acceleration) upon a termination without cause or a resignation for good reason, either alone or within one month prior to or 12 months following a change of control transaction. We do not maintain any agreements with NEOs providing for tax gross ups in connection with severance or change of control transaction. The Compensation Committee reviewed, and our Board approved, these severance benefits, after a review of market data provided by Radford, to ensure that the benefits remain appropriately structured and at reasonable levels. All change of control payments are structured to be on a “double-trigger” basis, requiring an involuntary termination in connection with the change of control transaction. The Board and Compensation Committee believes that these severance protection benefits are necessary to provide stability among our executive officers, serve to focus our executive officers on our business operations, and avoid distractions in connection with a potential change of control transaction or period of uncertainty. 

Our NEOs each hold stock options and RSUs under our equity incentive plans that were granted subject to our form of stock option agreements. A description of the termination and change of control provisions in such equity incentive plans and forms of stock option agreements are provided below under "Equity Compensation Arrangements.”

Regardless of the manner in which an NEO’s service terminates, the NEO is entitled to receive amounts earned during his or her term of service, including salary and unused vacation pay.

Pursuant to the terms of their employment agreements and the Company’s Change of Control Severance Benefit Plan, each of the NEOs (other than Dr. Bodick, who retired effective January 3, 2020) is entitled to certain severance and change of control payments and benefits. In order to receive any severance benefits, our NEOs must execute a release and waiver of claims within a set deadline as specified in their respective employment agreement, and they must also fully comply with the obligations under their respective proprietary information, inventions, non-solicitation, and non-competition agreements. The Company grants the severance benefits described below in order to attract and retain top executive talent. Enhanced severance benefits are provided for a qualifying termination that occurs in connection with a change of control because the severance benefits are also intended to mitigate any reluctance of our executive officers to diligently consider and pursue potential change of control transactions that may be in the best interests of our stockholders.

35


 

The following table summarizes the severance benefits available to our NEOs . With respect to Dr. Bodick, the following severance benefits were available prior to his retirement in January 2020. For a descripti on of the benefits available to Dr. Bodick in connection with his retirement , please see below under “Separation Agreement with Dr. Bodick.”

 

Termination

Type of
Severance

Dr. Clayman

Dr. Bodick

Dr. Kelley

Termination without cause or resignation for good reason

Cash

Base salary for 18 months

 

Base salary for 15 months

 

Base salary for 15 months

 

Benefits

COBRA premiums/health care benefit payments up to 18 months as eligible

COBRA premiums/health care benefit payments up to 15 months as eligible

COBRA premiums/health care benefit payments up to 15 months as eligible

Termination without cause or resignation for good reason one month prior to or 12 months following a Change of Control

Cash and/or equity

Base salary for 24 months

Annual target cash bonus for the year in which the termination occurs

All unvested stock awards vest

Base salary for 18 months

Annual target cash bonus for the year in which the termination occurs

All unvested stock awards vest

Base salary for 18 months

Annual target cash bonus for the year in which the termination occurs

All unvested stock awards vest

Benefits

COBRA premiums/health care benefit payments up to 24 months as eligible

COBRA premiums/health care benefit payments up to 18 months as eligible

COBRA premiums/health care benefit payments up to 18 months as eligible

 

For purposes of the Company’s Change in Control Severance Benefit Plan, which governs the benefits provided in the event of a termination without cause or a resignation for good reason in connection with a change of control:

 

     “cause” generally means the executive’s termination by us due to any of the following events: (i) commission of any felony or any crime involving fraud; (ii) attempted commission of, or participation in, a fraud or act of dishonesty against the Company; (iii) intentional, material violation of any contract or agreement between the employee and the Company or of any statutory duty owed to the Company; (iv) repeated and willful failure to satisfactorily perform his or her job duties after written notice and an opportunity to cure; or (v) engaging or participating in any activity which is directly competitive with or injurious to the Company or which violates any material provisions of his or her proprietary information and inventions agreement with the Company.

 

     “change of control” generally means (i) any person or entity becomes the owner of more than 50% of the Company’s combined voting power; (ii) a consummated merger, consolidation or similar transaction to which the Company is a party and the Company’s stockholders do not own more than 50% of the combined voting power of the surviving entity or its parent company; (iii) a consummated sale, lease or other disposition of all or substantially all of the Company’s consolidated assets; or (iv)  the Company’s stockholders or the Board approves a plan of complete dissolution or liquidation or such dissolution or liquidation otherwise occurs.

 

     “good reason” generally means a resignation within 90 days after the occurrence of any of the following events, provided the executive first gives written notice to the Company and an opportunity to cure for 30 days after such notice: (i) a material reduction of the employee’s annual base salary; provided, however , that Good Reason shall not be deemed to have occurred in the event of a reduction in employee’s annual base salary is pursuant to a salary reduction program affecting substantially all of the employees of the Company at employee’s level and that does not adversely affect the employee to a greater extent than other similarly situated employees; (ii) a material reduction in the employee’s duties, authority or responsibilities; (iii) a relocation of the employee’s principal place of employment that increases the one-way commute by more than 50 miles; or (iv) a material breach by the Company of any material agreement between the employee and the Company.

36


 

For purposes of the e mployment a greements, which govern the benefits provided in the event of a termination without cause or resignation for good reason not in connection with a change of control:

 

     “cause” for purposes of Dr. Clayman’s and Dr. Bodick’s employment agreements generally means the executive’s termination by us due to his (i) repeated and willful failure to satisfactorily perform his duties after written notice and an opportunity to cure; (ii) misconduct or dishonesty that materially injures our business, business reputation or business relationships; (iii) conviction of, or pleading guilty or nolo contendere to, a felony; (iv) any act of fraud against the Company; (v) personal dishonesty taken in connection with his responsibilities that is intended to result in substantial personal enrichment; (vi) repeated refusal or failure to follow lawful directions of the Board, which remain uncured after written notice; or (vii) engagement or participation in any activity directly competitive with or injurious to the Company or, which violates any material provisions of his proprietary information and inventions agreement with the Company or permitted activities described in his employment agreement after written notice. Dr. Bodick and the Company entered into a Separation Agreement, which became effective in January 2020 pursuant to which Dr. Bodick will no longer be eligible for these severance benefits.

 

    “cause” for purposes of Dr. Kelley’s employment agreement generally means his termination by the Company due to his (i) commission of a felony or crime involving fraud, dishonesty or moral turpitude; (ii) attempted commission of, or participation in, a fraud or act of dishonesty against the Company; (iii) material violation of any contract or agreement with the Company or of any statutory duty owed to the Company; (iv) unauthorized use or disclosure of the Company’s confidential information or trade secrets; (v) gross misconduct; or (vi) failure or refusal to perform the material duties and responsibilities of his position.

 

     “change of control” for purposes of each NEO’s employment agreement generally means (i) any person or entity becomes the owner of more than 50% of the Company’s combined voting power; (ii) a consummated merger, consolidation or similar transaction to which the Company is a party and the Company’s stockholders do not own more than 50% of the combined voting power of the surviving entity or its parent company; (iii) a consummated sale, lease or other disposition of all or substantially all of the Company’s consolidated assets; or (iv) with respect to Dr. Kelley, the Company’s stockholders or Board approves a plan of complete dissolution or liquidation or such dissolution or liquidation otherwise occurs.

 

     “good reason” for purposes of each NEO’s employment agreement generally means the executive’s resignation within 90 days after the occurrence of any of the following events, provided the executive first gives written notice to the Company and an opportunity to cure for 30 days after such notice: (i) a material reduction of his annual base salary; (ii) a material reduction in his duties, authority or responsibilities; (iii) a material reduction in his annual base salary; (iv) a relocation of his principal place of employment that increases his one-way commute by more than 50 miles; or (v) a material breach of his Employment Agreement.

Separation Agreement with Dr. Bodick

In December 2019, we announced Dr. Bodick’s retirement from his role as Chief Scientific Officer of the Company, which became effective as of January 3, 2020 (the “Separation Date”). In January 2020, we entered into a separation agreement with Dr. Bodick (the “Separation Agreement”). Pursuant to his Separation Agreement, Dr. Bodick is eligible to receive separation pay equal to 15 months of his base salary in effect as of the Separation Date, up to 15 months of COBRA premium payments and his annual cash performance bonus for 2019. Further, pursuant to his Separation Agreement, Dr. Bodick will be retained as a consultant to the Company for a period of up to 12 months from the Separation Date. As a consultant, Dr. Bodick will receive a fixed consulting fee of $10,000 per month and will continue to vest in his outstanding stock options and RSU awards. The term of all outstanding stock options is modified to be the earlier of (a) the 10-year anniversary of the grant date and (b) three months after the end of the consulting period. The Separation Agreement provides for potential vesting acceleration of outstanding equity awards in connection with specific termination events. Pursuant to the Separation Agreement, except as provided therein, Dr. Bodick is not entitled to any additional compensation, severance or benefits following the Separation Date.


37


 

Perquisites, Health, Welfare, Retirement Benefits

The NEOs (other than Dr. Bodick) are eligible to participate in the Company’s employee benefit plans, including the Company’s medical, dental, group life, disability and accidental death and dismemberment insurance plans, in each case on the same basis as all of the Company’s other employees. The Company provides a 401(k) plan to its employees, including the NEOs, as discussed in the section below entitled “401(k) Plan.”

The Company generally does not provide perquisites or personal benefits to its NEOs, except in certain limited circumstances. The Company does, however, pay the premiums for group term life insurance and long-term disability benefits (and, with respect to long-term disability benefits, the Company provides a tax gross up relating to such payment) for all of the Company’s employees, including the NEOs and the Company pays or reimburses the NEOs for a portion of their health and dental premiums. None of the NEOs participate in qualified or non-qualified defined benefit plans sponsored by the Company. None of the NEOs participate in pension plans sponsored by the Company. The Board may elect to adopt qualified or non-qualified benefit plans or pension plans in the future if it determines that doing so is in the Company’s best interests.

401(k) Plan

The Company maintains a defined contribution employee retirement plan (“401(k) plan”) for its employees. The Company’s executive officers are also eligible to participate in the 401(k) plan on the same basis as the Company’s other employees. The 401(k) plan is intended to qualify as a tax-qualified plan under Section 401(k) of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). The plan provides that each participant may contribute up to the lesser of 100% of his or her compensation or the statutory limit, which was $19,000 for calendar year 2019. The Company made a 3% non-elective match on behalf of all Company participants, including the NEOs. Participant contributions are held and invested, pursuant to the participant’s instructions, by the plan’s trustee.

Clawbacks

As a public company, if we are required to restate our financial results due to our material noncompliance with any financial reporting requirements under the federal securities laws as a result of misconduct, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer may be legally required to reimburse our Company for any bonus or other incentive-based or equity-based compensation they receive in accordance with the provisions of section 304 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Additionally, we intend to implement a Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act-compliant clawback policy to the extent that, the requirements of such clawbacks are finalized by the SEC.

Anti-Hedging and Anti-Pledging Policies

Our insider trading policy prohibits all directors and officers from pledging or engaging in hedging or similar transactions in our stock, such as prepaid variable forwards, equity swaps, collars, puts, calls and short sales.

 


38


 

Outstanding Equity Awar ds at 201 9 Year En d

The following table shows for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019 certain information regarding outstanding equity awards for our NEOs:

 

 

 

 

 

Option Awards (1)

 

 

Stock Awards

Name

 

Grant Date

 

Number of

Securities

Underlying

Unexercised

Options:

Exercisable

(#)

 

 

Number of

Securities

Underlying

Unexercised

Options:

Unexercisable

(#)

 

 

Option

Exercise

Price

Per

Share (2)

($)

 

 

Option

Expiration

Date

 

 

Number of

Shares or

Units of

Stock

That Have

Not Vested

(#)

 

 

Market

Value of

Shares or

Units of

Stock

That Have

Not Vested

($)

 

 

Equity

Incentive

Plan

Awards:

Number of

Unearned

Shares,

Units or

Other Rights

That Have

Not Vested

(#)

 

Equity

Incentive

Plan

Awards:

Market or

Payout

Value of

Unearned

Shares, Units

or Other

Rights That

Have Not

Vested (3)

($)

Michael D. Clayman, M.D.

 

09/24/2009

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

0.16

 

 

09/23/2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

08/29/2012

 

 

136,530

 

 

 

 

 

$

2.52

 

 

08/28/2022

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

03/03/2014

 

 

200,000

 

 

 

 

 

$

17.61

 

 

03/02/2024

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

01/21/2015

 

 

110,000

 

 

 

 

(4)

$

22.91

 

 

01/20/2025

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

01/04/2016

 

 

151,770

 

 

 

3,230

 

(5)

$

18.20

 

 

01/03/2026

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

12/20/2016

 

 

131,250

 

 

 

43,750

 

(6)

$

18.56

 

 

12/19/2026

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

02/01/2018

 

 

55,903

 

 

 

60,764

 

(7)

$

22.31

 

 

02/01/2028

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

03/01/2019

 

 

 

 

 

290,000

 

(8)

$

14.75

 

 

03/01/2029

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

02/01/2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

21,875

 

(11)

$

452,813

 

 

 

 

 

Neil Bodick, M.D., Ph.D.

 

09/24/2009